close
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Concept Solidarity by Durkheim: Mechanical and Organic Solidary

downloadDownload printPrint

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

Get custom essay

121 writers online

blank-ico
Download PDF

With the increased specialized role and responsibilities of individuals in society, Durkheim was interested in what holds society together. He provides an answer by developing a theoretical framework around two types of social solidarity and its relationship with systems of law. Societies with mechanical solidarity tend to be small with an emphasis on religious duty. People usually have the same jobs and responsibilities, consequently indicating a low division of labor. It is not a complex society, however, they are based on shared attitudes and obligations. Alternatively, societies characterized by organic solidarity, are more secular and individualistic due to the specialization of each of our jobs. Organic solidarity is more complex with a greater division of labor. To understand the source of social solidarity, Durkheim considers the examination of systems of law as an important agency for the understanding of morality. In this paper, I will explore how Durkheim might respond that criminal sanction is less repressive in our contemporary society.

According to Durkheim, as we shift from mechanical to organic solidary, we can observe a change in the nature of crime and moral sentiments. In mechanical solidarity, “an act is criminal when it offends strong and defined states of the collective conscience”. As society becomes more complex with more disparity in the division of labor, the weaker does the collective consciousness becomes which explains the lessening of crimes having collective object as their primary focus. It is these types of criminal offenses against public figures and its representatives, which transgress the collective conscience and thus a need for violent repression. Since this shift of solidarity decreases the prominence of collective sentiments, crime comes to be defined in more individual terms, and punishment for crimes tends to be more lenient. For example, violent crimes against the person were said to be injurious against the collective consciousness in traditional societies and physical punishment or, in extreme cases, capital punishment would be the appropriate punishment for such a crime. In our contemporary society, violent crimes against the person by offenders are progressively replaced by restitutive sanctions. For Durkheim, when compensation completely replaces physical coercion seen in traditional or religious society, punishment is viewed as less repressive in modern society. Durkheim also argued that imprisonment varying in time according to the seriousness of the crime, tend to become the primary mean for punishment. Durkheim suggests that the body of punitive choices has been progressively restricted to confinement alone.

I agree for the most part with Durkheim that modern society is lenient in repressive sanctions for deviant behaviors. The Canadian justice system, for example, does not focus on retribution but focuses more on rehabilitation, incapacitation, and deterrence of offenders. The recidivism rate of offenders is still very high from rehabilitation programs which shows that rehabilitation is less repressive than retribution. Also, many offenders who commit violent crime such as homicide and sexual assault in Canada gets a lenient prison sentence instead of the physical punishment seen in traditional societies. I found that Durkheim makes an interesting remark about prisons only coming into existence when society reached a sufficiently advanced stage of material development to permit the existence of the secure institution, such as castles or prisons in modern times for mass incarceration to become the main mean of punishment. The only part I disagree with Durkheim is on the fact that some advanced societies are characterized by severe punishment coupled with a larger number of collective crimes. For example, American justice is a lot stricter than our Canadian system. Accordingly, we have little reason to believe that the number of individual crimes identified and sanctioned correlates with the process of social development.

Due to the shift of mechanic solidarity to organic solidary, I have argued that Durkheim would respond that criminal sanction is less repressive in our contemporary society. This shift of solidarity has caused a decrease of collective sentiments and crime has come to be defined in more individual terms, and thus punishment for crimes tends to be more lenient. While the justice systems have shifted from corporal punishment to incarceration in most parts of the world, some complex societies are still characterized by severe punishment coupled with a larger number of collective crimes. The only weak point in Durkheim’s theory is that it did not take into account the plurality of culture in complex society or the individual traits in mechanical solidarity. Durkheim mainly idealizes society into two types of extreme solidarity when in reality each society is composed of many different types of solidarity.

Reference List

  1. Edles, Laura Desfor, and Scott Appelrouth. Sociological Theory in the Classical Era: Text and Readings. Los Angeles: Sage, 2015.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

experts 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help you just now

delivery Starting from 3 hours delivery

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Concept Solidarity by Durkheim: Mechanical and Organic Solidary. (2022, May 24). GradesFixer. Retrieved June 29, 2022, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/concept-solidarity-by-durkheim-mechanical-and-organic-solidary/
“Concept Solidarity by Durkheim: Mechanical and Organic Solidary.” GradesFixer, 24 May 2022, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/concept-solidarity-by-durkheim-mechanical-and-organic-solidary/
Concept Solidarity by Durkheim: Mechanical and Organic Solidary. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/concept-solidarity-by-durkheim-mechanical-and-organic-solidary/> [Accessed 29 Jun. 2022].
Concept Solidarity by Durkheim: Mechanical and Organic Solidary [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2022 May 24 [cited 2022 Jun 29]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/concept-solidarity-by-durkheim-mechanical-and-organic-solidary/
copy to clipboard
close

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.

    close

    Attention! This essay is not unique. You can get a 100% Plagiarism-FREE one in 30 sec

    Receive a 100% plagiarism-free essay on your email just for $4.99
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample
    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now
    boy

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay. Get custom paper
    exit-popup-close

    Haven't found the right essay?

    Get an expert to write you the one you need!

    exit-popup-print

    Professional writers and researchers

    exit-popup-quotes

    Sources and citation are provided

    exit-popup-clock

    3 hour delivery

    exit-popup-persone