Criminal Motivations of Sarah Jane Parkinson’s Criminality

Sarah Jane Parkinson garnered nationwide attention for her involvement in a series of criminal activities that spanned several years. From embezzlement to fraud, her actions left a trail of financial devastation and legal repercussions. This essay aims to analyze the criminal motivations behind Sarah Jane Parkinson's actions through the lens of criminological theories.

Overview of Sarah Jane Parkinson's Criminal Activities

Sarah Jane Parkinson's criminal activities include embezzlement, fraud, and forgery, which resulted in substantial financial losses for multiple individuals and organizations. The timeline of events leading up to her criminal activities reveals a pattern of deceit and exploitation that unfolded over several years, showcasing a deliberate and calculated approach to her illegal actions.

Rational Choice Theory

Rational choice theory posits that individuals make decisions based on a rational assessment of the costs and benefits associated with their choices. Applied to Sarah Jane Parkinson's criminal activities, this theory provides insight into her decision-making process and the factors that influenced her choices. Parkinson likely weighed the potential gains from her criminal activities against the perceived risks, ultimately opting to prioritize her own self-interests at the expense of others.

Social Learning Theory

Social learning theory emphasizes the impact of social environments and role models in shaping individuals' behavior. In the case of Sarah Jane Parkinson, her criminal motivations can be analyzed through the lens of social learning theory, highlighting the influence of her social environment and the reinforcement of criminal behavior. The presence of influential figures or peers who engaged in similar criminal activities may have facilitated the normalization and acceptance of unlawful behavior for Parkinson.

Strain Theory

Strain theory focuses on the role of societal pressures and structural constraints in contributing to criminal behavior. For Sarah Jane Parkinson, the presence of strain caused by external factors, such as financial difficulties or personal aspirations, may have prompted her to resort to criminal activities as a means of alleviating or escaping from the pressures she faced. Her response to these strains, whether through criminal conduct or alternative coping mechanisms, contributed to her eventual involvement in criminal behavior.

Psychological Factors

In addition to criminological theories, the analysis of Sarah Jane Parkinson's criminal motivations should also consider psychological factors that may have influenced her actions. Examination of personality traits, such as impulsivity or aggression, may shed light on her predisposition toward engaging in criminal behavior. Furthermore, an exploration of any underlying mental health conditions or disorders could elucidate additional contextual factors that contributed to her criminal motivations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the criminal motivations behind Sarah Jane Parkinson's actions are multifaceted and can be analyzed through various criminological theories, including rational choice theory, social learning theory, and strain theory. Additionally, the role of psychological factors in shaping her criminal behavior cannot be overlooked. Understanding the complex interplay of these factors is crucial for informing prevention and intervention strategies aimed at addressing and mitigating criminal motivations in individuals like Parkinson.

1. Rosenfeld, R., & Messner, S. F. (2018). Criminological Theory: An Analysis of its Underlying Assumptions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Akers, R. L. (2009). Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
3. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682.