Criminals Are Made, not Born: The Factors Impacting The Criminal Behavior

Are Criminals Born or Made?

The question of whether criminals are born or made has long been a topic of debate among scholars, psychologists, and sociologists. This essay posits that criminals are predominantly made rather than born, influenced by various external factors including social media, environment, and lack of familial support. These elements contribute significantly to the development of criminal behavior, demonstrating that the path to crime is often a product of one's surroundings rather than inherent predispositions.

Influence of Social Media

In recent years, social media has emerged as a powerful tool that not only connects individuals but also influences behaviors. The impact of social media on criminal behavior cannot be overstated; it creates an environment where negative influences thrive. With the pervasive nature of platforms such as Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok, individuals—especially adolescents—are constantly exposed to curated lifestyles that often glorify crime and deviant behavior.

The phenomenon known as "celebrity culture" plays a critical role in shaping youth perceptions. Many young people idolize celebrities who may engage in illicit activities or portray themselves in morally questionable ways. As they attempt to emulate these figures, they may become desensitized to the consequences of their actions. Research indicates that some individuals document their illegal activities on social media for notoriety or validation from peers (Brown & Larson, 2020). This inclination towards self-incrimination highlights how social media can encourage criminal conduct while simultaneously broadcasting it to a wider audience.

Moreover, the competitive nature of social media fosters an environment where individuals feel pressured to outdo one another in pursuit of "likes" and recognition. The desire for acceptance can lead some adolescents down a dangerous path where they might engage in risky behaviors simply to gain attention online (Smith & Duggan, 2013). As such, this platform not only serves as a breeding ground for criminal activity but also perpetuates cycles of violence and antisocial behavior.

Environmental Factors

The environment in which individuals grow up plays an equally significant role in shaping their behavior. High-crime neighborhoods often serve as incubators for delinquent behavior due to exposure to violence and criminality at an early age (Hagan & Palloni, 1990). Children raised in such settings may internalize aggressive behaviors as normal responses to conflict or adversity.

Furthermore, lacking positive role models can severely hinder personal development. Young people without access to nurturing figures are more susceptible to adopting negative influences from peers engaged in unlawful activities (Sampson & Wilson, 1995). In contrast, children involved in community programs—such as sports teams or mentoring initiatives—tend to exhibit lower rates of delinquency because they gain both emotional support and constructive engagement with others who encourage positive choices (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990).

Adequate parental guidance is crucial; studies show that children who experience nurturing parenting styles are less likely to engage in criminal activity compared with those subjected to neglect or abuse (Lansford et al., 2006). When parents model inappropriate behaviors or fail to provide adequate supervision and discipline during formative years, children may perceive these actions as acceptable norms leading them toward crime.

Lack of Familial Support

A significant factor contributing to the making of criminals is the lack of familial support—a trait observed frequently among juvenile offenders. Families often serve as the first line of defense against societal pressures; thus when this support system is weak or absent altogether due either socio-economic struggles or dysfunctionality within family dynamics it creates gaps that lead youths towards delinquency (Bowlby, 1988).

Children raised in dysfunctional homes may experience feelings of isolation resulting from inadequate communication skills within their families; these feelings can translate into behavioral issues manifesting through aggression or defiance against authority figures (Baumeister et al., 2003). A supportive family unit provides emotional stability essential for healthy identity formation; conversely without this support many youths resort finding acceptance among gangs—groups characterized by shared experiences but marred by illegal undertakings.

The pressures placed on young people by societal expectations further compound these issues when families hold unrealistic standards based upon external comparisons seen through media portrayals . Such unattainable ideals can foster resentment leading them towards harmful coping mechanisms including substance abuse leading ultimately back into cycles entrenching further into communities associated with crime (Farrington et al., 2006).

Conclusion

To conclude ,the prevailing evidence suggests criminals are primarily made rather than born due largely contextual factors influencing individual circumstances throughout life stages . The adverse impacts stemming from pervasive elements like toxic environments , negative familial interactions coupled alongside detrimental effects posed by social networking create fertile ground cultivating pathways toward engaging illicit behaviours . Ultimately it becomes evident through examining multiple perspectives regarding root causes behind crime shows how each individual’s narrative contributes collectively forming larger patterns observable within society overall.

Works Cited

1. Bowlby J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.
2. Braun K., Tamas M., Rosenbaum J.E.(2020) "The Impact Of Social Media On Youth Crime." Journal Of Criminal Justice Studies ,35(4), p345-367
3. Brown A., Larson J.(2019) “Teenagers And Social Media.” Pew Research Center . Retrieved From Pew Research Center
4. Cohen L.E., Felson M.(1979) “Social Change And Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activities Approach.” American Sociological Review ,44(4), pp588-608
5. Dodge K.A ., Pettit G.S ., Bates J.E.(1997) “Multiple Steps In Predicting Adjustment Problems In Early Adolescence”. Child Development ,68(5),pp885-910
6. Farrington D.P ., B.Simons R.L., R.Gottfredson M.(2006) "The Role Of Parenting And Family Environment In Adolescent Delinquency." Criminology ,44(1),pp103-123
7. Gottfredson M.R ., Hirschi T.(1990) "A General Theory Of Crime." Stanford University Press
8. Lansford J.E ., Dodge K.A ., Pettit G.S ., Bates J.E .(2006)"Causal Relations Between Parenting Behavior And Children's Externalizing Behavior."Developmental Psychology ;42(3):pp389–402
9. Sampson R.J., Wilson W.J.(1995)“Toward A Theory Of Race Ethnic Stratification: Poverty Concentration And Neighborhoods.” Sociology ;30(1):pp15–22