close
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Critique of The Expert’s Role in Forensic Assessment and as a Witness in Court

downloadDownload printPrint

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

blank-ico
Download PDF

An expert witness is an individual with training, knowledge and experience that assists the judge or the jury to understand the evidence or the scientific, technical and specialized facts regarding the case. Additionally, experts are often questioned about their opinion which they developed based on their expertise and the facts about the case. It is also the role of the expert witness to teach and explain the basics to the solicitors and educate them about the issues that they are not personally familiar with. With their help, the defence can be built on scientifically accurate information. The testimony of experts has to be clear and logical, they have to speak slowly and clearly, be truthful and as accurate as possible. This essay will draw from psychological theories to critique the role of the expert in forensic assessment and as a witness in court. More specifically the theory of confirmation biases, social role theory and source credibility theory will be discussed in relation to expert witnesses and their testimonies.

Experts are required to have knowledge about a specific issue at hand and not only be familiar with the area in general. However, meta-analyses of past expert reports have shown that not all experts meet the standards for testifying. Faust and Ziskin (1988) and Giannelli and McMunigal (2007) discussed the controversial discussions about the role and benefits or damages the expert witnesses can cause. Researchers think experts need to be more transparent about the significance or insignificance of findings provided. Additionally Duquette (1981) emphasized the concern about overlooking or overcompensating experts’ expertise and experience.

One of the key findings of previous research was the fact that one fifth of expert witnesses who testified, were not qualified to provide a valid and reliable psychological opinion. Many expert witnesses lack the focus on reflecting unbiased, independent assessment.

There are however standards that experts have to meet in order to be considered as an expert witness. These standards were first presented by Daubert in late 20th century, serving as guidelines for the judge to decide whether expert’s testimony is admissible or inadmissible and is overall beneficial or necessary for the testimony.

The criteria covers four categories, discussed in Rogers and Johansson-Love (2009) and Shapiro et al. The experts’ opinion and their expertise have to be falsifiable, tested or proven to be false. There has to be an error rate regarding the facts they are providing. The facts have to be peer-reviewed/published and overall generally accepted.

The Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991) advised that forensic assessments should reflect “current knowledge of scientific, professional and legal developments” and examine “the issue at hand from all reasonable perspectives, actively seeking information that will differentially test plausible rival hypotheses” (Section VI (C), 1991, p. 661). In addition, any assessment should “bear directly upon the legal purpose” of the evaluation and provide “support for their product, evidence, or testimony”. Finally, the forensic assessment process should enable communication that will “promote understanding and avoid deception” (Section VII (A), 1991, p. 663). Adding to the validity and the reliability of expert witnesses Rogers, Heilbrun and Otto (2004) highlighted the significance of commercially published facts, tests and scales that are used to aid expert witnesses to testify. This ensures consistency and uniformity. There also has to be an existing available manual to ensure the assessments are applied appropriately, scored correctly and interpreted within the rules. The reliability and validity have to be proven with consistency, repeated testing as well as show proof that tests and assessments are used for the purpose for which they were meant to be used.

However, these standards cannot always be adjusted to the forensic assessments, such failed example is knowing the error rate in child custody evaluation. Forensic assessments such as Sixteen Personality Factor, Personal, Home, Social and Formal Relations Questionnaires, Post Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Personality Questionnaire of Pretoria as well as Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory are all mostly based on self-reporting, self-evaluation, interview, psychotherapy or biographical data. It is therefore hard to demonstrate that these assessments are scientific and data reliable enough to be presented in court. 

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

experts 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help you just now

delivery Starting from 3 hours delivery

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Critique Of The Expert’s Role In Forensic Assessment And As A Witness In Court. (2021, August 06). GradesFixer. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/critique-of-the-experts-role-in-forensic-assessment-and-as-a-witness-in-court/
“Critique Of The Expert’s Role In Forensic Assessment And As A Witness In Court.” GradesFixer, 06 Aug. 2021, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/critique-of-the-experts-role-in-forensic-assessment-and-as-a-witness-in-court/
Critique Of The Expert’s Role In Forensic Assessment And As A Witness In Court. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/critique-of-the-experts-role-in-forensic-assessment-and-as-a-witness-in-court/> [Accessed 25 Oct. 2021].
Critique Of The Expert’s Role In Forensic Assessment And As A Witness In Court [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2021 Aug 06 [cited 2021 Oct 25]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/critique-of-the-experts-role-in-forensic-assessment-and-as-a-witness-in-court/
copy to clipboard
close

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.

    close

    Attention! This essay is not unique. You can get a 100% Plagiarism-FREE one in 30 sec

    Receive a 100% plagiarism-free essay on your email just for $4.99
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample
    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now
    boy

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer
    exit-popup-close

    Haven't found the right essay?

    Get an expert to write you the one you need!

    exit-popup-print

    Professional writers and researchers

    exit-popup-quotes

    Sources and citation are provided

    exit-popup-clock

    3 hour delivery

    exit-popup-persone