Differences Between Cunninghams and Ewells

In the small town of Maycomb, Alabama, there are two families that stand out among the rest - the Cunninghams and the Ewells. Both families are known for their poverty and social status, yet they have distinct differences that set them apart. This essay will explore the similarities and differences between the Cunninghams and the Ewells, shedding light on their backgrounds, behaviors, and attitudes. By examining these two families, we can gain a deeper understanding of the dynamics within Maycomb society.
The Cunninghams and the Ewells, despite their shared poverty, have contrasting backgrounds that contribute to their different behaviors. The Cunninghams, led by Walter Cunningham Sr., are hardworking farmers who strive to maintain their dignity despite their financial struggles. They are known for their integrity and pride in their land, often repaying debts through labor or bartering goods. The Ewells, on the other hand, are notorious for their laziness and lack of ambition. Bob Ewell, the head of the family, relies on welfare to survive and does not hesitate to exploit the system for personal gain. This stark difference in work ethic stems from their respective family values and upbringing.
Furthermore, the Cunninghams and the Ewells differ in their attitudes towards education and social interaction. The Cunninghams prioritize education and view it as a means of upward mobility. Although they may not have the resources to attend school regularly, they value learning and encourage their children to make the most of their limited opportunities. In contrast, the Ewells show little interest in education, often keeping their children out of school to work or simply neglecting their educational needs. This disparity in attitude towards education further perpetuates the cycle of poverty in the Ewell family.

Additionally, the Cunninghams and the Ewells have contrasting reputations within Maycomb society. While both families are viewed as outcasts due to their low socioeconomic status, the Cunninghams are regarded with respect and sympathy. Their hardworking nature and willingness to help others, despite their own struggles, earn them the admiration of their community. The Ewells, however, are seen as troublemakers and are generally despised by the townspeople. Their dishonesty, laziness, and involvement in criminal activities create a sense of distrust and disdain towards them. The differing reputations of these families highlight the importance of personal choices and behavior in shaping public perception.

In conclusion, the Cunninghams and the Ewells may share a similar socioeconomic status, but the differences between these two families are evident in their backgrounds, behaviors, attitudes, and reputations. The Cunninghams' work ethic, value for education, and integrity set them apart from the Ewells, who are characterized by laziness, disregard for education, and dishonesty. While both families face poverty, the Cunninghams are respected and admired, whereas the Ewells are despised and distrusted. This examination of the Cunninghams and the Ewells provides valuable insight into the complexity of Maycomb society and the impact of individual choices on social standing.

Overall, the Cunninghams and the Ewells serve as a microcosm of the broader social issues prevalent in Maycomb. Their differences shed light on the importance of values, education, and work ethic in shaping one's destiny. By understanding the distinctions between these two families, we can gain a deeper understanding of the social dynamics and inequalities within Maycomb. Furthermore, this analysis prompts us to reflect on our own society and the role that personal choices and opportunities play in determining our outcomes. Thus, the study of the Cunninghams and the Ewells invites us to consider the broader implications of poverty, education, and social status in our own lives and communities.

Bibliography:

Lee, Harper. To Kill a Mockingbird. HarperCollins, 2015.