By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 873 |
Pages: 2|
5 min read
Published: Apr 17, 2023
Words: 873|Pages: 2|5 min read
Published: Apr 17, 2023
This is summary response essay example for “Face Time v.s Screen Time: The technological impact on Communication”. In her article, Chandra Johnson explains the current scenario of the communication between people, and how people use technology as a tool to communicate where their involvement is negligible which degrades the quality of the conversion. She also pointed out how kids these days are using a lot of technology and their effects on them. Technology can be very useful to connect two people living far away but on the other hand, it also affects the quality of the communication. she conveys that “kids who spend lots of time online on different social media’s than with other people struggles to understand emotions”. In this article author has analyzed views of many different authors, as well as sturdily depicted her views and I completely agree with her thought that nowadays people lack emotional attachment and skills because of the online conversation.
Chandra Johnson states a point about how crucial platforms like the internet, social media and texting have become in the current situation in terms of representing one's feelings and thoughts. Here she points out to a situation that people currently have the extensive influence of these platforms in their life and so they should have a prominent understanding of emotions. Through a prime example of Brackett about his life is how there were no traces of Facebook for venting emoji, and no online communication with people to present their panorama she is trying to depict how different our communication approach would have been. Johnson in this essay has characterized a lot of people’s opinions about this topic and further elaborates her view point’s about it. Johnson buttons up her essay by pointing towards research about how technology is changing the way people communicate.
I believe that because of technology, people are more likely to connect with family and friends, but the value of that interaction may become worse. Children who spend more time on a screen than other children or adults may have difficulty understanding emotion, building strong relationships, or even becoming more dependent on others. The text explains how the difference can be how we grow with it as a person and learn to live with it. Learning to live with technology instead of letting it be the way you live will help people recover what they lose in feelings and sympathy towards others so that they can experience the value of face-to-face interaction while having a real connection with people without the impediment of teaching. Chandra’s article contains interesting points on how we do communicate more through the internet but how the quality of the conversation has weakened. Realizing that kids prefer to have physical contact with people to find a social bond. Kids spending all that time on the internet can stop them from developing basic needs like communication skills.
Dr. Roberts believes that people who heavily rely on the internet to communicate are in danger. She sees people constantly on their phones instead of having face to face conversations, which she sees to be a threat to society communication system. I believe that we are losing physical interactions and what it can provide. “Right now, at Boston College, there’s a course on how to ask a person on a date. It’s like we lost the skill of courtship and the ability to make that connection.”
The way we are using technology is changing us biologically. When children are born, they have pathways that the brain relies on for information between nerves. They get it out of music, touch, and play. But when a child is alone and on the internet, for the most part, the direction eventually changes. This may prevent them from developing the sympathetic and empathetic skills they need. Not having that face to face interaction can cause personal issues. People tend not to understand the meaning of modern-day communication. It does not lead to a deeper understanding. “Because parents are not speaking digital, the dinner table talk can suddenly be like someone speaking Spanish to someone who doesn’t.” We have to find a balance.
The problem is not the technology itself but the way we are using it. We need to find a way to spend more time making these connections and personal interactions than spending all of our time on the internet. We can begin by limiting the time we spend on our technology. The internet can be a safe place for people because they feel more comfortable than they do in the real world. “Roberts claims that it is human nature to avoid things and make uncomfortable situations easier on ourselves, so we often use technology instead of direct forms of communication.” By unplugging our devices during family time and meals, we can fix this problem.
To conclude, Chandra Johnson mentions important information about how technology is changing our lives by diminishing our communication skills. We use the internet to navigate the world and all it has to offer. That's why I find that technology is going to be one of the most important resources and help us to make our lives easier, but we do need to separate ourselves from it more often in order to have and understand the real world.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled