By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 725 |
Pages: 2|
4 min read
Published: Jun 6, 2024
Words: 725|Pages: 2|4 min read
Published: Jun 6, 2024
The idea of death with dignity, which is often tied to physician-assisted suicide, stirs up a lot of talks both ethically and legally. It makes you wonder, should people who are terminally ill have the legal right to end their lives with some help from doctors? Folks who say yes argue it respects personal choice and eases unbearable suffering. Those against it worry about messing with the sanctity of life or that it could be abused. Here, I'm gonna make the case that allowing death with dignity is the right call, backed by solid research and data.
One big reason folks support death with dignity is because of personal autonomy. Basically, people ought to decide what happens with their own bodies and lives, especially when dealing with something like a terminal illness. A survey by Pew Research Center found that around 66% of Americans think there are times when a patient should be allowed to die (Pew Research Center, 2013). This shows how society values personal autonomy and wants folks to have control over end-of-life choices.
This idea isn't just plucked outta thin air. It's based on Immanuel Kant's philosophy. He believed respecting autonomy means recognizing people's ability to make rational choices about their lives. For someone facing a terminal illness and all the pain that comes with it, denying them the option to die with dignity can feel like ignoring their autonomy. If we legalize physician-assisted suicide, it's like we're acknowledging their right to decide how they live—and die.
An equally strong argument for allowing death with dignity is that it helps ease suffering. Terminal illnesses can mean long stretches of pain, leaving patients with a pretty crummy quality of life. The Journal of Palliative Medicine points out that even though pain management has come a long way, about 40% of terminal patients still suffer significant pain in their final days (Journal of Palliative Medicine, 2015). In these situations, having the option for death with dignity can be seen as an act of compassion.
If you're looking at countries where it's already legal, like Oregon in the U.S., you'll see evidence supporting this argument. Since Oregon passed its Death with Dignity Act in '97, reports show 90% of patients choosing this path did so because they wanted to maintain control and dignity; over half were concerned about pain (Oregon Health Authority, 2020). This tells us giving patients this choice respects their wishes and spares them unnecessary suffering.
A common fear is that making death with dignity legal might lead to abuse or start down a slippery slope where life loses its value. But let's look at places where it's already legal—like Oregon or countries such as Belgium and the Netherlands—they have strict measures to prevent misuse. For instance, in Oregon, only patients who meet certain criteria can choose this route: they need confirmation from two doctors about their terminal status, must wait through a mandatory period, and undergo psychological evaluations (Oregon Health Authority, 2020).
Research backs this up too. Studies published in respected journals like the New England Journal of Medicine indicate these practices aren't being misused (New England Journal of Medicine, 2013). So long as we have proper rules and oversight in place, these risks can be kept minimal while ensuring ethical standards aren't compromised.
So there you have it: legalizing death with dignity stands firm on personal autonomy principles and compassionate care to relieve suffering. Evidence from regions practicing this already shows little risk for abuse if done right. Allowing people facing terminal illnesses the choice to end their lives peacefully not only respects them but also offers a humane response to what they're going through. Hence, we should permit it legally while keeping an eye on evolving discussions informed by real-world data and respect for individual rights.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled