Depiction of Humans as Inherently Evil in The Lord of The Flies

Lord Of The Flies Essay Outline

Introduction

• Introduction to the theme of 'the darkness of man's heart' in "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding
• Mention of primitivism, savagery, and human nature as central themes

'Fear of the Unknown' and its Impact

• Fear of the beast and the island as a representation of the unknown
• The emergence of fear at nightfall and in dreams
• Jack's manipulation of the boys' fear for his gain
• Simon's understanding of the true nature of the beast

The Collapse of Order and Authority

• The boys' initial adherence to societal rules
• The deterioration of their appearance and behavior on the island
• The role of authority figures in maintaining order
• The transformation of Roger into a violent and ruthless character

Jack's Descent into Evil

• Jack's initial compliance with societal norms
• His rebellion against Ralph's leadership
• The formation of Jack's savage tribe
• Jack's brutal and merciless actions towards the end

The Symbolism of the Beast

• The evolving perception of the beast
• Piggy and Simon's insights into the true nature of the beast
• The beast as a representation of the darkness within human nature

Conclusion

• The overarching theme of humans being inherently evil
• The impact of fear, the collapse of order, and the symbolism of the beast on the boys' behavior
• The reflection of the darkness in human nature portrayed in "Lord of the Flies"

Lord Of The Flies Essay Example

Lord of the Flies delves into the subject of ‘the darkness of man’s heart’. It explores the primitivism and savagery that comes with the human nature through the various characters and language choices. William Golding uses the concept of ‘fear of the unknown’ to show how it creates apprehension amongst the boys which leads to their chaotic behaviour. He explores the result of the absence of authority and order within a society. Golding also uses the boy’s conception of the ‘beastie’ as a symbol of the ‘beast’ within us.

The theme of ‘fear of the unknown’ runs throughout the book and is represented through the boys’ fear of the beast and the island. Fear first starts to appear at nightfall, when the younger boys have appearances of monstrous creatures in their dreams. The boys start wondering if they were in fact not alone on the island and start doubting their safety. “Ralph’s right of course. There isn’t a snake-thing. But if there was a snake we’d hunt and kill it. We’re going to hunt pigs to get meat for everybody. And we’ll look for the snake too.” (p 48) In this quote, Jack’s repetition of the ‘snake’ highlights their terror in dealing with the beast. Jack suggests that the ideal approach is to kill the beast even though he has no knowledge of what the beast is or what it is capable of. This shows when faced with a possible threat, human’s natural instinct to eradicate what they are frightened of incapacitates their rational thinking. Jack uses this fear to gain power and defect the children to join his side where he promises meat and security. “Piggy and Ralph, under the threat of the sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly secure society.” (p 187) Even the most rational characters in this novel felt willing to go against their morals and values to join Jack’s tribe because it assured the somewhat safety against the beast. The boys’ struggle against the beast results in Simon’s gruesome death which symbolises humanity’s incapability when confronted with apprehension. Humankind’s natural instinct to act impulsively in the face of fear makes them savage and unruly.

Humans are inherently evil when left to fend for themselves. Without rule or order within a society, they are destined to crumble. The boys in Lord of the Flies come from a world where their parents controlled and educated them. From the moment they arrive on the island, these boundaries are removed and instead the boys must decide for themselves what is judicious. They start off confined by the rules of the society that they were accustomed to. “His sandy hair, considerably longer than it had been when they dropped in, was lighter now; and his bare back was a mass of dark freckles and peeling sunburn. A sharpened stick about five feet long trailed from his right hand, and except for a pair of tattered shorts held up by his knife-belt he was naked.” (p 66-67) Golding uses Jack’s changing appearance as a metaphor for his diminishing humanity. Already we can see how the island is affecting Jack and turning him into a savage creature. The lack of an authoritative figure to reprimand the boys creates a state of anarchy and more opportunities for tyranny because of the absence of consequence. “Roger stooped, picked up a stone, aimed, and threw it at Henry— threw is to miss… Yet there was a space round Henry, perhaps six yards in diameter, into which he dare not throw. Here, invisible yet strong, was the taboo of the old life.” (p 62) Roger at first throws the rocks without the intention to harm because he still living by the rules of his past life. Further on in the novel, Roger rolls a boulder off the top of a mountain onto Piggy, killing him instantly, showing that Roger has changed from being a civilised boy who knows the limits to which he is restricted to, to someone who resorts to violence and has inclinations to kill and to harm. The growth of a harmless pebble into a lethal boulder shows Roger’s character development from an innocent boy into a murderous savage. From this, we can see that without civilisation and authority, humans become corrupt and act without consequence or empathy.

Jack shows that he is indeed evil many times throughout the book because of his lack of connection with society. When all the boys arrive on the island, they are substantially good because the expectations of society are still fresh in their heads. They elect Ralph as the leader of all boys on the island, Jack does not complain too much because he thinks that some adult would get mad at him for digressing on who’s the leader, even though there are none on the island. This means that Jack is very used to have adults who would get mad art him for arguing or talking back. When jack fully realises, he goes against Ralphs right to lead by saying” He aint a proper chief… He’s a coward himself” (page 126). Jack feels very big and powerful of the fact there are no adults present and no one can tell him what to do, and after that he goes against Ralph and his leadership and leaves this group. Jack then moves away to the other side of the island with some of the other boys and hunts wild pigs. Jack figures out that there are no on the island to tell him what’s right and what’s wrong and brings a savage tribe to existence in which most of the boys join. Jack is now the president of the tribe and in total control. He creates scary feasts like eating pigs which he violently kills, and screams phrases like “kill the beast, cut his throat, spill his blood!”. By the end of the book Jack become very horrific and orders his people kill Ralph without any hesitation, by telling his followers that Ralph is a big threat to the tribe.

The beast plays a strong role in the novel because it symbolises the darkness residing within the boys, and within human nature. The boys fear in the beast advances alongside with their savagery. “What would a beast eat?” / “Pig.” / “We eat pig.” / “Piggy!” (p 104) Golding uses this line and the repetition of the word ‘pig’ to foreshadow the boys killing Piggy. The beast is a metaphor for the boys’ primitive nature. The beast begins as only the construction of the younger boys, but starts to develop and grow into the evil within them. “’Unless we get frightened of people.’ / A sound, half-laugh, half-jeer, rose among the seated boys.” (p 105) Piggy was the first to suggest that maybe the beast was not tangible and instead a manifestation of their own sinfulness and savagery. The boys immediately reject this idea and laugh mockingly at him. They have already been convinced that the beast is real and find it harder to grasp the fact that the beast could be only a figment of their own imagination. “What I mean is… Maybe it’s only us.” (p 111) Simon also suggests the inexistence of the beast. Golding uses Simon as a character who is a symbol of humanity and compassion. Simon has a strong understanding of what the beast really is, especially after his encounter with “the Lord of the Flies.” It is ironic that the only two virtuous characters, Piggy and Simon, are the ones who get murdered showing the true power of the beast. The beast embodies primitive human behaviour in their most natural state.

Ultimately, Lord of the Flies shows that humans are innately evil. Golding suggests that the ‘fear of the unknown’ allow the boys to succumb to foolishness and irrationality. The absence of the rules of civilisation in Lord of the Flies causes chaos and disorder amongst the boys. Without the order of daily life, humans run wild. It reflects upon the darkness in human nature, which is apparent with the symbolism of the beast. Lord of the Flies presents an unnerving portrayal of the true darkness within man’s heart.

Works Cited

1. Goldhurst, W. (1964). The Lord of the Flies: A Study in the Inner Conflict of the Human Psyche. University of California Press.
2. Golding, W. (1954). Lord of the Flies. Faber and Faber.
3. Hynes, S. (1962). William Golding: The Man and His Books. Faber and Faber.
4. Johnson, R. L. (1997). The Evolution of the Symbolic System in Lord of the Flies. William Golding's Lord of the Flies. Chelsea House Publishers.
5. Koopmans, M. (2021). The Psychology of Evil: William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. Human Ethology Bulletin, 36(2), 16-25.
6. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press.
7. Lindop, G. (2010). A literary guide to England and Wales. Methuen Publishing.
8. Rosenfield, C. L. (1963). The Characters of Lord of the Flies. The Antioch Review, 23(3), 347-362.
9. Tiger, V. (1965). The Beast in the Lord of the Flies. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 23(1), 53-58.
10. Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random House LLC.