Neoliberalism And The Art Of Dancing: [Essay Example], 859 words GradesFixer

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!


Professional writers and researchers


Sources and citation are provided


3 hour delivery

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Neoliberalism and the Art of Dancing

  • Category: Life
  • Subcategory: Hobby
  • Topic: Dance
  • Pages: 2
  • Words: 859
  • Published: 30 April 2020
  • Downloads: 42
Download Print

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF

What spoke to me as one of the central points of departure as to how the readings for this week conversed with each other is the complex way that artists of dance access this ‘art form’ and in the process, developed articulations that situated artists either in conformance, refusal or going against the breadth of neoliberalism. Kunst argued that art no longer needs to reaffirm itself as a socially relevant and valuable movement because the economy, in particular, locked it within ingrained capitalist and populist fabrication of value. What she asserted was that art has to rediscover its material basis and move into reclaiming its power to strongly associate the abilities of the abstract (thinking) with the actual abstractions (value, capital, time, money, etc. ). Her work mapped the evolution in the organization of labor, where she showed how the modernist claim that “the work of art and the work of life should be inseparable” has established itself in the core of the capitalist society. To strengthen her claim, Kunst searched for ways to reclaim ‘work’ and to unshackle artistic work from its neoliberal counterpart.

For me, her insightful analysis on how artist delve into work and her discussion on the pathways to rebel against the project of neoliberalism demanded the temporality of work as duration that has been particularly helpful in encouraging her readers to stop seeing art as something that may be measured in economic terms/standards and to stop treating art or any creative production for that matter as if one’s engagement into art fits comfortably in the usual conventions of work. She endeavored to break down the phenomena of intertwining the principles of the neoliberal economy and the organization of work in the world of art and she also emphasized the paradoxes in the art world just like how museums of contemporary nature, considered as active spaces of experimentation and discovery, can be placed side by side to the way that democratic authoritarian structures and other corporations functioned and communicated in contemporary times.

For her, seeing contemporary dance and performance art should encourage a fluid based orientation and engagement as opposed to a complete whole for it to be a practice that will push an individual to advocate for flexibility rather than ‘static-ness’ — turning the artist as an active participant and producer of dynamism in the social structure. Lepecki’s work furthered the inherent agency of dance by teasing out experimental dance as a mode of critical thinking to problematize neocolonial capitalist management over the projections of corporeality and subjectivity. The author laid out five directions in which ‘revolutionary’ choreography can gather or imagine a new community that projects singularities and express freedom beyond liberal individualism through the discussion of thingness, darkness, animality, persistence, and solidity. It showed how singularity inhabited events in which human and non-human bodies, affects, and temporalities “gather momentarily and peripherally, risking their recognizable identities for generating forms of coexistence. ” Lepecki proposed that choreographic experimentation has become a site as well as a method for the unfolding of singularities and through this, the entire social field is generated and sustained by experimental choreographic practices.

More so, the author showed how dance held the potential for transformative performances of selfhood and relationality. To render a microcosm through the lens of the historical development of somatics, Doran George traced how dancers used the idea of nature to tackle and confront changing social circumstances. Their work showed how dancers turned to nature in search of personal authenticity as a source of freedom. By engaging in the practice, dancers across the network believed that they have reclaimed an inherent right to individual creative freedom by displacing modern and classical aesthetics with dance based on the natural functioning of anatomical structures that decentered the rhetoric about nature and ended its supposed to be primary role as to how somatics came to be when artists became entrepreneurs in line with the economic culture that encouraged individualism in the 1980’s. This development of a somatic pedagogy has then introduced a new approach to acquiring facility at dancing that relies on the intensive study of anatomy and promotes an economy of motion in executing any action. More importantly, it showed how internal transnational connections that were formed in the realms of somatic practice supported the movement of U. S. expansionism on one hand and global capitalist values on the other.

One of the many instances that these connections of labor and the ease/unease involved between art and dance that I can relate with was when macho dancing in the Philippines became prevalent in the 1980’s as a performance that involved young men engaging in a stage performance inside nightclubs for a variety of audience. It has become an economically motivated language of seduction, rendering of gaze, and a complex positioning of the dynamics of body aesthetics, labor, and art using the notions of masculinity as a body capital. This specific Philippine phenomenon during that time seemingly generated a gender loop in which both the performer and the audience were entangled—reenacting social mobility and the desire for performance despite the reality of mobility as slippery, constrained and momentary in those spaces of performance.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Neoliberalism And The Art Of Dancing. (2020, April 30). GradesFixer. Retrieved November 28, 2020, from
“Neoliberalism And The Art Of Dancing.” GradesFixer, 30 Apr. 2020,
Neoliberalism And The Art Of Dancing. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 28 Nov. 2020].
Neoliberalism And The Art Of Dancing [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2020 Apr 30 [cited 2020 Nov 28]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

    Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you



    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.