On Being a Cripple Rhetorical Analysis

Author Nancy Mairs, in her essay "On Being a Cripple," brings forth a compelling argument about the use of the word "cripple" and how it has shaped her identity and perception of herself. Mairs, who herself is disabled due to multiple sclerosis, uses various rhetorical strategies to convey her message and challenge the societal norms surrounding disability. By analyzing the rhetorical devices employed in Mairs' essay, we can gain a deeper understanding of her argument and the impact it has on the reader.

Mairs' essay is filled with personal anecdotes and experiences, which serve as the foundation for her argument. She opens the essay with a bold statement, "I am a cripple," immediately grabbing the reader's attention and setting the tone for the rest of the essay. Mairs deliberately chooses to use the word "cripple" rather than the more politically correct term "disabled" or "challenged" to emphasize her point. By using this provocative language, she challenges the reader to confront their own discomfort with the word and the stigma attached to it.

Throughout the essay, Mairs employs pathos to evoke an emotional response from the reader. By sharing her personal struggles and the impact of her disability on her daily life, she elicits empathy and understanding. For example, Mairs describes the physical limitations imposed by her disease, such as the inability to walk long distances or perform simple tasks. This evokes a sense of sympathy from the reader and forces them to confront the harsh realities of living with a disability.

Furthermore, Mairs uses ethos to establish her credibility as a writer and a disabled individual. She discusses her academic background and professional accomplishments, demonstrating that her disability does not diminish her intelligence or abilities. By presenting herself as a capable and accomplished individual, Mairs challenges the stereotype of disabled people as helpless or incompetent. This strengthens her argument and lends weight to her perspective.

Additionally, Mairs utilizes logos to appeal to the reader's sense of logic and reason. She presents a clear and logical argument for reclaiming the word "cripple" and rejecting euphemistic language. Mairs argues that by using euphemisms, society perpetuates the idea that disability is something to be ashamed of or hidden. Instead, she advocates for embracing the reality of disability and challenging the societal norms that marginalize disabled individuals. This logical appeal encourages the reader to critically examine their own attitudes towards disability and language.

Overall, Mairs' use of rhetorical strategies effectively conveys her argument and challenges the reader to reconsider their preconceived notions about disability. By combining personal anecdotes, emotional appeals, and logical reasoning, she creates a persuasive and thought-provoking essay that leaves a lasting impact. Through "On Being a Cripple," Mairs invites the reader to confront their own biases and engage in a meaningful dialogue about disability and language.