This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Personal Management Contract: Preston V. Ferrer

downloadDownload printPrint

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF

In PRESTON v. FERRER, (2008) there is a conflict between two individuals that created a contract together. A contract between respondent Ferrer, who comes out as as “Judge Alex” on television, and petitioner Preston, an attorney in the entertainment industry, requires arbitration of “any dispute … relating to the contract’s terms … or the breach, validity, or legality thereof … in accordance with the American Arbitration Association rules.” Preston summoned this provision to receive payment owed under the contract.

The issue began when Ferrer decided to deny payment to Preston, when in fact the contract claimed that Ferrer would give commission to Preston. The commission given would be based on Ferrer’s television personality “judge Alex.” However, Ferrer decided that he would not pay Preston, which is why Preston went to court to get everything sorted out. Ferrer petitioned the California Labor Commissioner to conclude that the contract was invalid and unenforceable due to California’s Talent Agencies Act because Preston had executed the contract as a talent agent without the required license. . Soon the main question was whether or not the contract was valid due to Preston acting like a licensed agent when the contract was created. This issue was in violation of Talent Agencies Act rules, causing an argument between the two parties.

In Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., which originated in federal court, was held that claims on an entire contract’s validity, as distinct from claims on the arbitration clause alone, are within the arbitrator’s ken. Buckeye held that the same rule must be respected in state court. Because the contract at issue did not address the order of proceedings and included a choice-of-law clause adopting California law, the Volt Court recognized as the gap filler a California statute authorizing the state court to stay either third party court proceedings or arbitration proceedings to avoid the possibility of conflicting rulings on a common issue. Here, in contrast, the arbitration clause delivers to the question in controversy; both parties are engaged by the arbitration agreement. The question of Preston’s status as a talent agent is concerning to the legality of the contract. Preston and Ferrer’s contract includes a choice-of-law clause, which states that the “agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of California.” A separate saving clause provides: “If there is any conflict between this agreement and any present or future law,” the law dominates over the contract “to the extent necessary to bring [the contract] within the requirements of said law.” Those constitutional terms, according to Ferrer, call for the application of California procedural law, including a grant of restricted jurisdiction to the Labor Commissioner.

Ultimately, Ferror relied too much on Volt from Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S.. Relying on Volt caused another issue since circumstances were different. In this case, the arbitration clause addresses the matter in controversy; it states that “any dispute … relating to … the breach, validity, or legality” of the contract should be arbitrated in accordance with the American Arbitration Association (AAA) rules.

infoRemember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism-free

Sources and citations are provided

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Personal management contract: Preston v. Ferrer. (2019, February 11). GradesFixer. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from
“Personal management contract: Preston v. Ferrer.” GradesFixer, 11 Feb. 2019,
Personal management contract: Preston v. Ferrer. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 20 Sept. 2021].
Personal management contract: Preston v. Ferrer [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2019 Feb 11 [cited 2021 Sept 20]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! This essay is not unique. You can get a 100% Plagiarism-FREE one in 30 sec

    Receive a 100% plagiarism-free essay on your email just for $4.99
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer

    Haven't found the right essay?

    Get an expert to write you the one you need!


    Professional writers and researchers


    Sources and citation are provided


    3 hour delivery