close
test_template

Reflection on The Lecture Session on Scientific Methods and The Nature of Science

download print

About this sample

About this sample

close

Words: 762 |

Pages: 2|

4 min read

Published: Apr 2, 2020

Essay grade:
Good
arrow downward Read Review

Words: 762|Pages: 2|4 min read

Published: Apr 2, 2020

Essay grade:
Good
arrow downward Read Review

At this class session, the concept of “The Nature of Science” was the introductory topic the students. It forced us to think about whether science is subjective and or objective. Even if a scientist thinks objectively and proposes a statement, he or she could only verify that by researching facts that can support said statement. Whereas, if another scientist thinks subjectively and proposes a statement, he or she could not verify said statement by providing solid-based facts and or figures. In other words, Objectivity in science is mainly unbiased whilst subjectivity in science is mainly biased. I before was misinterpreted by thinking that “Science” was solely based on experiments. Little did I know, that the conceptualization was based on the laws of nature? It allows scientists to predict and check observations and or theories that he or she may have proposed when looking at science and its’ consistent patterns. I strongly believe that even though science entails the focus of environmental factors and nature, solid evidence ought to be proposed with facts to verify any given theory.

'Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned'?

When I think about “Environmental factors”, I consider the aquatic life, transportation, natural resources, politics and climate change of Trinidad and Tobago. The solid evidence would be required in attempt, for one’s theory and or statement to hopefully gain acceptance under the scientific laws of science. Theory and or statement’s considered for acceptance under the scientific laws of science. Wherein, with the “Scientific laws”, I would state that this involves the concrete evidence accompanied by a scientist’s theory and or statement. Next, we did a class activity that allowed us to answer two crucial questions. What do you see? How do you see?

The first image was that of a tree but the tricky aspect of it all was that there were other images, within this said one image. At first, I only saw a lion and bird but when encountering the same image a second time, I saw a monkey and fishes. In my opinion, this collection of images for testing one’s visual abilities and interpretational skills. It portrayed the ideal function of “seeing the bigger picture” and in extension seeing a more detailed artistic vision of any given image. It’s clear that the human mind does help a person with perceptions. The senses of a human body and its’ mind are all connected, as they act as waves that send messages to the brain. This is how the brain decipher, what the senses are trying to tell it or figure out. Whether it be, building a puzzle or completing a mathematical calculation. Many ancient philosophers such as: Aristotle would have used the method of induction to make observations and construct their own theories. These said philosophers, would have done this without any earlier knowledge of certain idealistic in the earlier times and I found this very astonishing. In pre-historic times, the men would have already established laws and theories that are now being re-established present-day. This is mainly due to the obvious fact that there were no records of said laws and theories or no one to make documentation of these theories.

Similarly, “Christopher Columbus” claimed to have discovered “a new world”, when he only re-discovered what was already in existence, being that of the Caribbean. This is how I was able to make connections. The last sub-topics of this lecture was “Inductive and Deductive reasoning”, as well as “Hypothetico-Deductive Methods”. However, I did not quite grasp the concept of said topics so they are still very confusing to me.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.

In order, to improve my appreciation and understanding of said sub-topics. I would do individual research and watch the YouTube videos listed on the PowerPoint slides composed for the lecture. It so turned out that the product of “Inductive reasoning” is that of discovering a new piece of information and “Deductive reasoning” is used to prove it. It seems to me that one type of reasoning cannot exist and or succeed without the other. As much as “Inductive reasoning” involves many investigations and or observations, “Deductive reasoning” is the aid in establishing evidence of any proposed theory or statement. Although, I’m still in the process of understanding the concept of “Inductive and Deductive reasoning”. Applying these methods to research tactics can be very effective in assignment writing. Specifically, if a student is examining the style of argumentative writing. Allowing a good means of proving one’s point based on findings of a particular topic area. Later resulting in the product of utilizing the concepts of the “Inductive and Deductive reasoning”, in future references.

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson
This essay was graded by
Dr. Oliver Johnson
Essay’s grade:
Good
What’s grading
minus plus
Expert Review
The essay provides a reflection on a lecture session about scientific methods and the nature of science. The essay is well-organized and focused on the topic. The writer used a formal and academic tone throughout the essay, and the sentence structure and grammar are adequate. However, there are a few instances of repetitive word usage that can be improved. The writer used personal examples to support their understanding of the concepts, but the essay lacks a clear thesis statement that summarizes the main point of the essay.
minus plus
What can be improved
The essay provides a thorough reflection on the lecture session, but there are areas that require improvement. Firstly, the writer uses repetitive word usage throughout the essay, such as "solid evidence" and "scientific laws". This can be improved by using synonyms or rephrasing the sentences. Secondly, the essay lacks a clear thesis statement that summarizes the main point of the essay. The writer should include a sentence at the beginning of the essay that clearly outlines the focus of the essay. Additionally, there are a few instances of grammatical errors, such as using "I before was misinterpreted" instead of "Before this lecture, I misinterpreted". The writer should review the essay for grammatical errors before submitting. Furthermore, the writer could have provided more specific examples of how the lecture session has changed their approach to team working. The writer briefly mentions the application of the inductive and deductive reasoning methods to research tactics but does not provide a clear explanation. To improve the essay, the writer should focus on providing a clear thesis statement and using more specific examples. The writer should also review the essay for repetitive word usage and grammatical errors. The essay's structure and organization are adequate, but the writer could have used more transitional phrases to connect the ideas. Overall, the essay provides a good reflection on the lecture session but requires some improvements.

Cite this Essay

Reflection on the Lecture Session on Scientific Methods and the Nature of Science. (2020, April 02). GradesFixer. Retrieved March 19, 2024, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/reflection-on-the-lecture-session-on-scientific-methods-and-the-nature-of-science/
“Reflection on the Lecture Session on Scientific Methods and the Nature of Science.” GradesFixer, 02 Apr. 2020, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/reflection-on-the-lecture-session-on-scientific-methods-and-the-nature-of-science/
Reflection on the Lecture Session on Scientific Methods and the Nature of Science. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/reflection-on-the-lecture-session-on-scientific-methods-and-the-nature-of-science/> [Accessed 19 Mar. 2024].
Reflection on the Lecture Session on Scientific Methods and the Nature of Science [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2020 Apr 02 [cited 2024 Mar 19]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/reflection-on-the-lecture-session-on-scientific-methods-and-the-nature-of-science/
copy
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

close

Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

    close

    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

    clock-banner-side

    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    exit-popup-close
    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now