Science Versus Religion: Finding an Agreement

It is difficult to deal with the relationship between religion and science because its explanation involves a clear understanding of what we mean by any of the words ' religion ' and ' science.' The type of connection between the two spheres must be understood. Then we need to draw certain definite conclusions with regard to the current world situation.

When we think about this subject, the conflict between religion and science is what happens naturally. During the last half century, science and religious beliefs seemed in a position of frank disagreement, which cannot be avoided, except because the simple philosophy of science or the clear teaching of religion had been discarded. Of course, not all polémicists, but the trenchant intellects that all controversy calls into the open.

Their heartfelt sympathy must be the suffering of fragile minds and the passion for reality and a sense of the importance of issues. It's not an exaggeration when we take into consideration what religion is and what science it is to suggest that the future course of history depends on this generation's decision as to its relations. A great English politician once advised his compatriots to make use of broad maps to prevent warnings, panics and the general confusion of the true relations between nations. It is also good to map our history on a large scale and disassociate ourselves from our immediate absorption in the conflicts that are taking place. In dealing with the clash between constant elements of human nature. If we do, we consider two great things instantly. First of all, there has always been a conflict between religion and science and, secondly, there has always been a state of constant development between both religion and science. But all our theories will be misguided if we conclude that this recurrent problem was restricted to inconsistencies of religion and science and that religion and science always were wrong in these controversies. The true facts of the case are considerably more complex than those mentioned above.

Science will affect even more than theology. No scientist may adhere to Galileo's beliefs or to Newton's beliefs, or his entire scientific convictions of ten years ago, without a qualification. Therefore, in a sense, a little emphasis has been placed upon the conflict of science vs religion. A pure logical inconsistency in itself can only point to the need for revisions on both pages, probably very small in nature. Remember the things in science and religion deal with many different aspects. The general factors that have been established to govern physical phenomena are concerned with science; whereas religion is fully involved in considering spiritual and esthetic principles. The law of gravity, on the one hand, and the contemplation of the perfection of holiness, on the other. What the other lacks on one hand, and vice versa.