The Impact of Concertive Control Theory on College Students

Introduction

In today's fast-paced and complex society, college students face various challenges that require both personal and academic growth. As they navigate through this critical period in their lives, they encounter numerous influences that shape their behaviors and attitudes. Among these influences is the concept of concertive control theory, which suggests that the control over individuals' behavior and actions can be maintained not only through direct supervision but also through the internalization of organizational values and norms. This essay aims to explore the theories of concertive control and their impact specifically on college students.

The Concept of Concertive Control Theory

Concertive control theory, proposed by Barker and Gebhard in 1983, challenges the traditional notions of control within organizations. Unlike traditional control mechanisms such as direct supervision or formal hierarchies, concertive control theory emphasizes peer surveillance and self-regulation. According to this theory, control is achieved through the internalization of organizational values and norms, which are upheld and enforced by employees themselves. To comprehend the impact of concertive control theory on college students, it is crucial to examine the control mechanisms employed within academic institutions. Firstly, peer surveillance plays a significant role in shaping behavior. Fellow students, as part of the community, act as the "watchdogs" who monitor and enforce adherence to the established norms. This informal network of control is powerful, as it places the responsibility of monitoring and reprimanding on peers themselves. Secondly, self-regulation is another vital control mechanism. College students are expected to internalize the values and norms of the academic institution and exercise self-discipline accordingly. Instead of relying on external authorities to regulate their behavior, students are encouraged to accept these norms voluntarily and become self-governing individuals.

The application of concertive control theory in the college context has several implications for college students. Firstly, it creates a sense of collective responsibility and shared norms. Students are encouraged to identify with the institution and actively participate in shaping its culture. This fosters a sense of belonging and encourages the development of a strong community where students can thrive. Secondly, concertive control theory promotes the development of self-discipline and autonomy among college students. By internalizing the institutional values and norms, students learn to regulate their behavior independently. This cultivates a sense of personal responsibility and prepares them for future professional environments where self-regulation is crucial. Furthermore, concertive control theory challenges traditional power structures. Formal hierarchies become less consequential as control shifts to the collective. This egalitarian approach empowers every individual within the college community, enabling them to contribute to decision-making processes and exercise influence.

Potential Challenges and Criticisms

Despite its advantages, concertive control theory also faces potential challenges and criticisms when applied to college students. Firstly, the pressure to conform to institutional norms might lead to stifling creativity and independent thinking. Students may feel restricted in expressing their individuality and may conform to the perceived "ideal" student archetype, compromising their personal growth. Secondly, the reliance on peer surveillance can create an atmosphere of competition and judgment. Students may be hesitant to deviate from established norms due to fear of rejection or criticism from their peers. This can lead to a lack of diversity of thought and limits the exploration of alternative perspectives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, concertive control theory presents a unique and alternative perspective on control within organizations, including academic institutions. By emphasizing peer surveillance and self-regulation, this theory has the potential to shape the behaviors and attitudes of college students. While it fosters a sense of community and individual autonomy, it also poses challenges in terms of creativity and diversity of thought. Understanding and critically analyzing the implications of concertive control theory on college life is crucial in providing a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence student behavior and development.