close
test_template

Utilitarianism: Ethics and Moral Philosophy and Utilitariantheorists

download print

About this sample

About this sample

close

Words: 462 |

Page: 1|

3 min read

Published: Sep 25, 2018

Words: 462|Page: 1|3 min read

Published: Sep 25, 2018

One particular form of utilitarianism focuses not on the total sum of positive wellbeing and suffering, but on minimizing the total sum of suffering. This is called negative utilitarianism. Another perspective defends that we should increase not the total sum of happiness (which could lead to one entity enjoying great bliss while everyone else suffers) but the average happiness enjoyed by all sentient individuals. This theory is known as “average utilitarianism”. Standard utilitarianism, though, defends that there should be as much happiness as possible, which is calculated by considering all the positive happiness that exists and subtracting from it all the suffering that exists.

'Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned'?

According to utilitarianism, the wellbeing of every individual counts. If in our moral decisions we fail to take into account the interests of someone who has positive or negative experiences, then we are failing to consider the total sum of happiness. This means that discrimination against sentient nonhuman animals, who have positive and negative experiences or preferences, is incompatible with a theory such as utilitarianism. This theory must take into account every bit of suffering and every bit of happiness, which means taking into account the experiences of nonhuman animals as well as humans.

For this reason, the first utilitarian theorists, such as Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick, argued for the moral consideration of nonhuman animals. They stated that the interests of nonhuman animals should be respected as equal to those of humans. However, they failed to see the practical consequences that follow from this, such as the rejection of animal exploitation.

In recent times, theorists such as Peter Singer and Gaverick Matheny have examined what follows from the inclusion of the interests of nonhuman animals implied by utilitarianism. For utilitarianism, the use of nonhuman animals can be acceptable only if the happiness their exploitation causes is greater than the harm it causes. But it is very hard to think of any way in which this could be the case. Nonhuman animals are abruptly and painfully deprived of their lives after having been deprived of most of the positive experiences they could have had, and after having been made to suffer terribly. Because it takes so much suffering to produce such momentary pleasures as tasting animal products, using animals does not increase the sum of happiness in the world, but actually decreases it, and very much.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.

Therefore, such exploitation cannot be considered morally legitimate according to utilitarianism. In addition, utilitarianism cannot just accept that we should do nothing about the harms suffered by others even when we aren’t the ones who have caused these harms. Utilitarianism claims we should be concerned with the happiness of all who can be happy. If there is something reducing the happiness of animals, then we should try to work against it, whatever it may be.

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson
This essay was reviewed by
Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

Utilitarianism: Ethics and Moral Philosophy and UtilitarianTheorists. (2018, September 14). GradesFixer. Retrieved May 26, 2024, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/utilitarianism-and-utilitarian-theorists/
“Utilitarianism: Ethics and Moral Philosophy and UtilitarianTheorists.” GradesFixer, 14 Sept. 2018, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/utilitarianism-and-utilitarian-theorists/
Utilitarianism: Ethics and Moral Philosophy and UtilitarianTheorists. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/utilitarianism-and-utilitarian-theorists/> [Accessed 26 May 2024].
Utilitarianism: Ethics and Moral Philosophy and UtilitarianTheorists [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2018 Sept 14 [cited 2024 May 26]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/utilitarianism-and-utilitarian-theorists/
copy
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

close

Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

    close

    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

    clock-banner-side

    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    exit-popup-close
    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now