close

In the “Letter From Birmingham Jail” how does King rebut his critics’ claim?

Updated 21 March, 2023
Answer:
In "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Martin Luther King Jr., King rebutted his critics' claim by questioning the fairness of the laws in a counterclaim. He argued that laws are only just if they promote the common good, and that any law that violates the fundamental principles of justice is unjust. He went on to argue that segregation laws were inherently unjust, and that therefore it was morally justifiable to break them through civil disobedience.
Detailed answer:

In "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Martin Luther King Jr., King offered a multi-faceted rebuttal to his critics' claim that his nonviolent resistance tactics were inappropriate and counterproductive. One of the main ways he did this was by questioning the fairness of the laws themselves.

King argued that laws are only just if they promote the common good and that any law that violates the fundamental principles of justice is unjust. He went on to argue that segregation laws were inherently unjust because they violated the basic principles of human dignity and equality. By questioning the morality of the laws themselves, King was able to make a powerful argument for why it was not only morally justifiable but necessary, to break these unjust laws through civil disobedience.

In addition to questioning the fairness of the laws, King also addressed his critics' concerns about the timing and method of his protests. He argued that waiting for change to come through the legal system alone was not enough and that direct action was necessary to bring attention to the injustices faced by Black Americans in the South. He also highlighted the importance of nonviolent resistance, arguing that it was the most effective way to bring about lasting change without resorting to violence.

Overall, King's rebuttal was a masterful piece of persuasive writing that addressed his critics' concerns head-on and provided a compelling argument for why civil disobedience was not only morally justifiable but necessary in the fight for racial justice. By questioning the morality of the laws themselves and providing evidence to support his claims, he made a powerful case for why direct action was necessary to effect social change.

Do you have any other questions?
Question has been sent. We'll take a look at it in 1 day Ask another question
close
close

Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

    close

    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

    exit-popup-close
    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now