A Look at The 1969 Moon Landing History

In 1969, Neil Armstrong was the first man to walk on the moon. Or was he???? For the first time it is now, possible to present the compelling evidence that the Apollo 11 moon landing of July 20, 1969 was a hoax. There is plenty of evidence to support this contention.... Different questions have been raised about the footage taken on the moon, also the physical and technical impossibilities that surround the phony moon landing is substantial enough to prove it untrue. Not only that, the political situation between the U.S. and the Soviet Union was strained.

When we look at photographs of the Apollo 11 mission, we see a range of errors. In all the pictures, the sky appears dark and starless. The moon has only one light source being the sun, the shadows on the pictures should be parallel, however, the shadows are not parallel, and there fore the images are faked. The non-parallel shadows probably came from the different light sources around the filming set. These light sources would explain why there are no deep, hoax shadows in any of the pictures. The shadows should be pitch black because there is no air on the moon to scatter the light; nevertheless, the objects in the shadows appear exceptionally clear. The crew members of Apollo 11 were not expert photographers, yet all the photographs we see are perfectly aligned and centered. This would be difficult even for a professional photographer considering the cameras were mounted on the chest of their spacesuit. This evidence alone is sufficient to confirm that it was all one big hoax.

When the rocket left the moon to bring the astronauts back into orbit, there was no flame from the rocket. Obviously every rocket has a visible flame, which proves that the takeoff was faked. Some more recent evidence concerns radiation found in the Van Allen belts that surround the earth. Any passengers in a spacecraft as primitive as the Apollo 11 would have been subjected to deadly radiation as soon as they left the safety of earths orbit into unknown hazards of space radiation. In addition to the fact that the Lander was so primitive and crudely built, it would not only perish in the radiation it would be incapable of balancing itself to land on the moon. Astronauts shifting in the cabin would have offset the center of mass, which in turn would have thrown it of balance.

The state of affairs with the U.S. and the Soviet Union was tense. The Soviets had a five-to-one lead on the U.S. in hours in space. They were the first to send a man-made satellite into earth orbit, the first to send a man in space, first man to orbit the earth, they had the first woman in space, the first space walk. Pressure due to the Cold War with the Soviets forced the NASA to fake the moon landing.

Werhner Von Braun was a NAZI brought to United States after the war to help NASA build rockets. He was NASAs chief rocket scientist (and a former Nazi SS officer). He was involved in the faking of the moon landing in order to escape prosecution for his war crimes.

After be made aware of all this evidence you might be wondering why would they fake a moon landing. We have to look into this carefully and ask who influenced this and who benefited from this the most. A successful manned mission to the moon offered a brilliant, pride-boosting distraction for the nearly revolting American citizens over the 50 000 deaths in Vietnam. It was reasoned that the risk was great or even insane, but the plan would be worth it in the long run. All majors goals were met, but the impact was overestimated. The Americans with their newfound satisfaction did not last for long because the flaws of the space expedition were so evident. Over 20% of Americans have doubts about the lunar landing.

But why does NASA insist on living a lie? Why would astronauts stay silent about this? The truth is that the Apollo 1 fire that killed Roger Chaffee, Ed white, and Gus Grissom was no accident. Grissom was ready to talk to the press about the moon hoax, so NASA killed him. NASA also accidentally killed other people who were about to let the media know.

You have to look closely at what actually happened in New York and the Pentagon things that the media would prefer not to scrutinize. Since September 11, the American people have grown complacent under George Bush. George Bush, however, realized that his campaign promises would never materialize. Only a national crisis would keep this from being made obvious. This is yet another scandal, just think of all the political antics that we unaware of. Richard Nixon was president at the time of the Apollo 11 mission. He was the king of cover-up, secret tapes, and scandal; this moon landing obviously was another one of his antics.

In conclusion, we see that the government has become deceitful and corrupt. This political scam clearly does not demonstrate a democracy, but an oligarchy where the supreme power is place in the hands of an exclusive few. This oligarchy, the government, of course, has never hesitated to sacrifice human life for their own greater causes. Their motto is, whatever works is okay, as long as we're not found out What should hinder them from faking a moon landing. Why doesn't the media pursue these things? Actually, the reason is clear. The truth would be far too devastating for the citizens of America and have far too great an impact on the American people's faith in leadership. Wherever there is any sort of institution of however many members it always boils down to one person at the top. What he says or does can affect the whole institution, in the same way the government is comparable. It is and always will be like that, but if we just accept as true everything the media tells us, the more corrupt the government will become. Even if this evidence is conclusively proved, it is as story that could never be told.