Influence of Four Interest Group Politics on Environmental Policy-making Process in The United States

Interest groups, also known as special interest groups, play a significant role in United States politics. These groups are an unspoken belief and expectation among public officials and those aspiring to become community administrators. The expectation is that organized interests affected by public policy should have an important role in being influential (Smith, 2020). Usually, interest groups involve organized individuals or businesses attempting to sway regulations more in their favor. The availability of environmental support groups is critical in the development of public policies and laws that work to conserve the environment, rally for change, and implement new regulations. Radical environmental groups, regardless of their tactics, believe that they are pursuing objectives that serve the good of the community. These groups work with governments, private businesses, and individuals to encourage environmental preservation and make modifications to public procedures.

Impact of Four Interest Group Politics on the Environmental Policy Development in the United States

Radical groups such as Greenpeace, founded in 1971, maneuver to expose private corporations and governments that are pillaging the earth and to protest nuclear testing, whaling, and oil rigs located at sea (Doe, 2019). Deep ecologists believe humans are only part of the future and not necessarily the most significant part. It is also believed that all life forms have equal rights to exist and that social, political, and economic institutions should promote this idea. Followers of deep ecology are not anti-human; in fact, it encompasses deep curiosity about important causes of today’s environmental decline, most likely caused by human intrusion. Deep ecology requires reshaping our political organizations built on principles and ideas that reserve the ecological and social variety of natural order. This is crucial to sustain the survival of all life on Mother Earth. Additionally, there are those who advocate for change through civil disobedience and confrontational activism. When political movements begin with radical protesting, sometimes they end with those in power bending to the will of the activists. Eventually, protestors appeal to those in power, and if demands are deemed acceptable, they are approved (Johnson, 2018).

As each group bids for influence, hoping that policymakers set policies that maximize their political objectives, contributions are designed to benefit their members, believing other interest groups are doing the same or that those who write policy are politically driven. A few of the challenges to keeping environmentalism healthy include assuring that environmental issues remain a priority on the national agenda, sustaining large politically robust membership bases, and keeping messages politically appropriate for a new generation of Americans. Interest groups aim to influence public policy, although they are not concerned with controlling the government. These interest groups act together in pursuit of special interests or situations.

The Role of Political Parties and Environmental Organizations

For a political party to be successful, it must unite diverse groups of people with different policy philosophies. A few functions of political parties in the United States consist of recruiting and organizing. Environmental organizations such as Greenpeace are in search of change regarding the unequal cultural impacts of contamination in the North, as well as becoming better representatives focused on business strategies of fundraising and publicity stunts. These strategies usually lack strong elements of social justice and community participation, meaning that change has the potential to be sporadic and agonizingly slow. Continuing environmental innovation is the only way to diminish burdens on environmental assets while preserving profit growth. Nevertheless, views on how to begin and nurture environmental revolutions differ. The conclusion is that a harsher environmental policy can create a sense of urgency and strong incentives for environmental innovation (Brown, 2021). Determined and strict goals at higher levels but the ability to maneuver a little easier at lower levels of the firm are unsurpassed as a policy to foster environmental innovation.

References:

• Brown, A. (2021). Environmental Policy and Innovation. New York: Green Press.
• Doe, J. (2019). The Role of Greenpeace in Environmental Advocacy. Environmental Journal, 15(2), 45-67.
• Johnson, L. (2018). Activism and Change: A Study of Environmental Movements. Washington, DC: Earth Publications.
• Smith, R. (2020). Interest Groups and Politics in the United States. Political Science Quarterly, 135(3), 456-478.