Compare of Pygmalion by Myhtihcal Form

Pygmalion, written in 1912 by George Bernard Shaw and initial performed 2 years later, tells the story of Henry Higgins, an academic acoustics (speech), United Nations agency bets his friend that he will pass off a poor flower woman with a Cockney accent as a noblewoman by teaching her to talk with associate degree class accent. Pygmalion was a proficient Greek sculptor from Cyprus. When changing into sick by some native prostitutes, he lost all interest in ladies and avoided their company fully. within the 2 stories "Pygmalion," by, physiologist Shaw and therefore the story, there are similarities and differences which makes one story reminiscent of another, and yet unique enough to set them apart from each other. The element of metamorphosis is evident in both stories. Both of the changes are considered to be for the better, and yet in order to fully comprehend what is going on in the two plots, it is necessary to analyze the motives for these changes.

In Greek and Roman mythology, Pygmalion was a sculptor who falls in love with a statue he has made. He offers the statue presents and eventually prays to Venus. She takes pity on him and brings the statue to life. He names her Galatea. They marry and have a son. In the two stories"Pygmalion," by, Bernard Shaw and the myth, "Pygmalion," by Ovid, there are similarities and differences which makes one story reminiscent of another, and yet unique enough to set them apart from each other. The element of metamorphoses is evident in both stories. Both of the changes are considered to be for the better, and yet in order to fully comprehend what is going on in the two plots, it is necessary to analyze the motives for these changes.

Instead of taking things at face worth, the story"Pygmalion," by, physiologist Shaw and also the story,"Pygmalion," by Ovid, show the U.S. that we tend to should look deep into people's motives: is what they're doing actually about to facilitate the opposite person, or can they just be serving to themselves. Was Higginshonestly involved with Eliza's well-being or was he looking all the difficulty so as to indicate individuals his "trophy" On the opposite hand, the sculpture remains a constant person who Pygmalion originally fell infatuated with?

Another distinction that I notice in each story is that within the finish, Pygmalion espouse to mythical being and livedmirthfully ever once whereas professor. Higgins remained as a bachelor however he began to admire her new character, associate freelance and defiance woman. Compare the play with the story of Pygmalion from the Greek Mythology. I found that in terms of similarities, both Pygmalion and Prof. Higgins have the same view of women and as a result, they vowed not to be married. Both of them are confirmed, bachelor. Pygmalion does not want to be married because he despised so many qualities in women that he could not bear the idea of marriage and as for Prof.Higgins; he thinks that ‘women upset everything’. He said, “When you let them into your life, you find that woman is driving at one thing and you driving another”. The second similarity is that both of them are involved in creating something’. Prof. Higgins transforms a cockney speaking flower girl from the gutter to become a well-spoken and poised Duchess of the high society. As for Pygmalion, his creation comes in the form of a sculptor of a woman that he sculpted from an ivory and which he called Galatea (means sleeping, love).

Pygmalion was written just before World War I - a time when people believed that Improvement could be achieved in a peaceful, civilized way; if scientific development and feminism were to join together, the combination might enable further development of mankind and society. The play is a gem of optimism before the deluge of a world war. Still, Higgins the scientist and Eliza the woman remain separate: Shaw the dramatist is not that optimistic. The end of the play suggests that man is not yet aware that women problem is also men’s problem and that men, as well as women, must be liberated. Higgins remains a “baby” to the end in dealing with human relationships. He has yet to learn to respect the “spark of divine fire” in other people.