Analysis Of The Effect Of Death Penalty On Crime Rates In The Case Of Iran: [Essay Example], 1775 words GradesFixer

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!


Professional writers and researchers


Sources and citation are provided


3 hour delivery

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Analysis of the Effect of Death Penalty on Crime Rates in the Case of Iran

Download Print

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF


Iran leads the death penalty chart, with an incredible number of executions completed in 2011 and the initial ten months of 2012. All around, just China executed more individuals. Iran’s per capita execution rate is additionally high. The correct number is difficult to quantify, in large part in light of the fact that a huge disparity exists between official figures enlisted by government specialists and those gathered by human rights organizations. The yearly number of executions is between 282 and 700 when the two executions held in mystery and those led out in the open are incorporated. On average, two individuals for every day were executed amongst January and June 2012. On 22 November 2012 the European Parliament endorsed a determination censuring the utilization of capital punishment in Iran. The conditions in which these individuals died and the kind of offense with which they were charged are further sources of concern. According to Iran Human Rights Documentation Center (IHRDC) and its since quite a while ago, point by point 2012 executions’, a large portion of the general population executed were blamed for drug trafficking. In any case, numerous NGOs and investigators expect that some of these executions were in actuality inspired by political causes. Despite the prohibition of global human rights law on applying the death penalty to individuals younger than 18 (Article 6(5) of the ICCPR), Iran does adolescent executions. Alterations to the Iranian Penal Code that are right now proposed hold the work on (barring for medicate related offenses or ta’zir-based crimes). The most disturbing components of the proposed legal reform are new corrections of the time of criminal Iraq executed more than 62 individuals In 2011, and more than 102 in the initial nine months of 2012.

When force is assembling over the world to nullify capital punishment right now positions second for number of executions, after China, and first for per capita executions on the planet. As indicated by the World Coalition against the Death Penalty, Iran executed no less than 3172 individuals in 2007, twice the same number of as in 2006 and fourfold the number of as in 2005. In 2008, no less than 346 executions were recorded. From January through the finish of March 2009, Amnesty International has recorded 120 executions. These numbers are positively beneath reality, since there are no openly accessible insights on executions completed in the nation. Cautioned by the expanding number of executions from one perspective, and the industriousness of practices that explicitly repudiate universal human rights gauges identifying with capital punishment on the other, FIDH (International Federation for Human Rights) chose to do an investigation on
the utilization of the death penalty in Iran. The present report depends on recorded research. The statistical data points in this investigation depend on reports of the most solid and non-fanatic universal human rights associations, including Amnesty International, FIDH, Hands off Cain and Human Rights Watch (HRW). Joined Nations sources and in addition daily papers distributed in Iran have additionally been utilized. Moreover, we have utilized the first Iranian government sources, i.e. the legal, the parliament and other state organs, to get to laws and directions relevant in the IRI. Tragically that, regardless of rehashed asks for in the course of recent years, Iran has not yet enabled FIDH to complete a reality discovering mission inside its outskirts.

Historical Outline.

Capital punishment has been in broad use in Iran for a long time, the figures hopping radically since the 1979 unrest. Promptly after the rebellion, the new administration of the Islamic Republic, whose pioneers had already favored feedback of the Shah’s human rights record, propelled a flood of executions. The principal year after the unrest demonstrated the veracity of the execution of various lawmakers, officers and mystery police specialists of the previous administration who had not figured out how to escape the nation. Various lower level police were supposedly not saved either. While the quantity of executions ran around a few hundred in the two years after the Islamic transformation, a sharp increment was enlisted in 1981 after the wicked concealment of the resistance gatherings and the conflicts between the security powers and those gatherings, eminently the PMOI, in June that year. Reprieve International recorded 2,616 executions amid 1981, yet the genuine figures are accepted to be extensively higher. The trials, assuming any, were purportedly synopsis and the respondents were not given the likelihood to delegate attorneys or to introduce their cases. The casualties in that year incorporated an extensive number of adolescents and numerous ladies.

Number of executions.

Table 1. Minimum number of executions, 1979-2009 (March)

The accompanying table has been gathered mostly in light of yearly reports issued by Amnesty International. However, figures from different sources have likewise been fused when accessible. Both Amnesty International and other human rights associations, for example, Hands Off Cain, that began distributing its yearly reports in 2000, have taken care to note in every one of their reports that the real figures could be considerably higher. A few explanations behind the mistakes are as per the following:

  • The Iranian specialists don’t distribute official figures of executions.
  • There have been countless executions.
  • Without authoritatively gave figures, human rights associations need to bind themselves
    to scrutinizing newspaper to record the executions.
  • The newspaper does not report all executions and they are every so often requested not to
    report them.
  • Data about executions in remote zones and common territories is particularly difficult to
  • Data was extremely insufficient in the initial couple of years after the insurgency.
  • Types of punishments which are leading to death penalty in Iran

Under the Islamic Penal Code (IPC) of 1991, disciplines are partitioned into five sorts.

    They are: hudood, qesas, diyeh, ta’zirat and obstacle disciplines.

• Hodood are disciplines whose write and extension have been dictated by the Islamic shari’a and can’t be driven or exculpated.

• Qesas is a retributive ‘eye for an eye’ discipline allocated for a scope of offenses.

• Diyeh (alluded to as blood cash) is monetary pay as controlled by the Islamic shari’a and paid to the casualty or his/her survivors.

• Ta’zirat are optional disciplines that have not been controlled by the Islamic shari’a and judges have the ability to choose them. They may incorporate detainment, lashing, fine and so forth

• Deterrent disciplines are disciplines dictated by the state, e.g. detainment, fine, conclusion of business, hardship from social rights, oust and different disciplines.

Iran is world’s top child executioner.

Iran positions as the world’s top child executioner. Most different nations have halted the training because of global and household weight. Since 1999 through March 2009, no less than 42 executions of juvenile guilty parties have been recorded in Iran, 12 of them in 2007 and eight out of 2008, however the genuine figures are probably going to be higher. As of late as July 2008, twenty-four worldwide and territorial human rights associations distributed a joint explanation approaching Iranian specialists to quit forcing capital punishment for violations conferred by adolescent wrongdoers. As indicated by the announcement, “very nearly 140 adolescent guilty parties are known to be waiting for capital punishment in Iran, however the genuine figure could be much higher – for instance, Mohammad Hassanzadeh’s case was not known to campaigners before his execution.”

Methods of execution.

In the Islamic Republic of Iran, judges have the ability to choose the method for execution. The most widely recognized type for execution is hanging. Other particular methods for execution incorporate stoning to death, issued in instances of infidelity, decapitating and tossing from a bluff, which are once in a while issued for assault or homosexuality.

Hanging. Death-row detainees were for the most part hanged in broad daylight numerous years prior to the 1979 upheaval, among different spots, at a square in southern Tehran, which was called ‘Maydan-e E’dam’.

Stoning. Under the Islamic Penal Code, it is a to a great degree troublesome undertaking to demonstrate sex/infidelity. It might be demonstrated if a criminal admits four times under the witness of a judge or by declaration of “four just men or three just men and two just women”.

Crime level in Iran.

The rate of criminal activity in the nation has diminished by 5% versus the earlier year, said police representative for crime, Aria Hajizadeh.

“The rate of revealing crime has expanded by 7% contrasted with a year ago,” he stated, Mehr News Agency announced.

Outfitted robbery likewise diminished by 7.5% amid a similar period. Medication trafficking is the most widely recognized wrongdoing in Iran.

Iran is a key travel point for drugs from southwest Asia to Europe. It imparts a 975-kilometer normal outskirt to Afghanistan-the world’s opium capital. Almost 40% of detainees in Iran have been sentenced on sedate related charges.

As per official figures, Iran has so far lost near 3,500 police and security officers to the counter medication crusade that yearly costs the country nearly $1 billion.


The laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran sentence by death an extensive number of offenses, including offenses that are not considered as “most genuine” under universal law – specifically political, financial, sedate related thus called sexual offenses. Current draft enactment on the parliament’s motivation would decrease the extent of the death penalty to a specific degree, however extend it to dereliction and enlarge its extension on account of obscurely expressed offenses, e.g. “corruption on earth.”

The strategies for execution may themselves add up to a brutal and corrupting treatment: stoning remains the discipline for infidelity, while individuals sentenced to death for different offenses are hanged. Hanging consistently happens in broad daylight, a training that contradicts universal human rights guidelines. Common society in Iran is to a great extent prepared against death by stoning and the death penalty for juvenile guilty parties. Nonetheless, there are no freely accessible measurements on the quantity of capital punishments articulated and executions actualized, and this keeps any educated open level-headed discussion on these practices.

In conclusion, the death penalty it is hard to say that it decreases crime level. According to the crime index in the world dataset (source: it equals to 50.01% which is a bit high in comparison with other Islamic countries.


Amnesty International, International Standards on the Death Penalty, Amnesty International, Abolitionist and Retentionist Countries
E. PEIFFER, ‘The Death Penalty in Traditional Islamic Law and as interpreted in Saudi Arabia and Nigeria’, Wm&Mary J; Women & L. 507, pp. 507-519, 2005

ABIAD, N., Sharia, Muslim States and International Rights Treaty Obligations: A Comparative Study, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, London, 2008 EP Resolution of 22 November 2012

Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, Chart of Execution by Iran, 2012

Human Rights Watch, Iran: Proposed Penal Code deeply flawed Amnesty International: Iraq Report 2012, Iraq: spiralling executions signal urgent need to end use of death penalty

H. SHERWOOD, ‘Gaza executions: Hamas condemned over ‘inhuman punishment’, The Guardian, April 2012 Amnesty International: Gaza: executions flout legal process, 18 July 2012

UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY: Resolution 62/149 of 18 December 2007; Resolution 63/168 of 18 December 2008; Resolution
65/206, Mar. 28, 2011

UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Moratorium on the use of death penalty The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) Strategy Paper

The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) Compendium 2007-2010 on the abolition of the death penalty worldwide

The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) Strategy Paper 2011-2013

European External Action Service, Background: the Death Penalty and the EU’s policy on its abolition HR/VP Catherine Ashton: speech to the European Parliament on human rights, Strasbourg 16 June 2010

Resolution of the European Parliament of 7 October 2010 on the World day against the death penalty

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Analysis Of The Effect Of Death Penalty On Crime Rates In The Case Of Iran. (2018, Jun 15). GradesFixer. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from
“Analysis Of The Effect Of Death Penalty On Crime Rates In The Case Of Iran.” GradesFixer, 15 Jun. 2018,
Analysis Of The Effect Of Death Penalty On Crime Rates In The Case Of Iran. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 21 Jan. 2021].
Analysis Of The Effect Of Death Penalty On Crime Rates In The Case Of Iran [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2018 Jun 15 [cited 2021 Jan 21]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

    Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you



    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.