Ending The War on Drugs in America

“Drug abuse is one of the most vicious and corrosive forces attacking the foundations of American society today. It is a major cause of crime and a merciless destroyer of human lives. We must fight it with all of the resources at our command. This Administration has declared an all-out, global war on this drug menace…” — Richard M. Nixon

Say no to plagiarism.

Get a tailor-made essay on

'Ending The War on Drugs in America'

Get original essay

On March 28, 1973, then-President Richard Nixon established the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and sought Congressional support for his escalating War on Drugs. The long-term consequences are now clear: hundreds of thousands of lives lost, the highest incarceration rate per capita in the United States, and intensified discrimination against Black Americans and marginalized communities. Internationally, this "war" has fueled violence in Latin American countries like Mexico, where corruption, power struggles, and cartel violence continue to harm civilians. Today, it is clear that the War on Drugs has failed on every front, and policies must shift to help drug users rather than criminalize them.

The Escalation of Violence: From Colombia to the U.S.

Following Nixon’s initial policy, Colombia became a focal point due to its cocaine industry. The violence began in earnest in 1975, when Operation Condor used the War on Drugs as a guise to silence opposition in Latin America. More than 60,000 lives were lost. The U.S. policy of asset seizure was expanded in 1978, allowing law enforcement to confiscate money and goods associated with drug offenses. By the 1980s and 90s, drug-related crime and incarcerations soared under President Reagan's administration, with drug-related imprisonment rates rising by 70%. From Colombia to Mexico, U.S. involvement further destabilized regions already plagued by cartel violence, particularly under the Mérida Initiative in Mexico, which militarized anti-drug operations.

The Human Cost of the War on Drugs in Latin America

The War on Drugs led to tragic events throughout Latin America. In Mexico, high-profile incidents underscore the violence's scale: mass shootings, kidnappings, and thousands of unmarked graves have become commonplace. For instance, in Ciudad Juárez in 2010, gunmen attacked a birthday party, killing 13 teenagers. That same year, mass graves were found in Monterrey, with over 70 bodies, many showing signs of torture. These violent outcomes led to a 2011 report from the Global Commission on Drug Policy, declaring the War on Drugs a failure.

The Ongoing Economic Burden of the War on Drugs

The economic impact of the War on Drugs is staggering. Every year, the United States spends over $47 billion on drug enforcement, diverting funds that could support addiction treatment, healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Since 1971, the U.S. has spent an estimated $1 trillion on this “war,” with little measurable success. The high incarceration costs are an additional financial burden: with nearly 2.3 million people in U.S. prisons and 20% for drug-related offenses, taxpayers spend approximately $14.7 billion annually on incarcerations alone.

Disparities in Arrests and Racial Discrimination

Statistics reveal a stark racial disparity in drug-related arrests. Black Americans are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for marijuana-related charges compared to white Americans, despite similar usage rates. The roots of this discrimination trace back to Nixon's administration, where policies deliberately targeted Black communities and anti-war activists under the guise of drug enforcement, as revealed by Nixon advisor John Ehrlichman.

Why the War on Drugs is Doomed to Fail

The War on Drugs cannot succeed due to its flawed approach, ignoring fundamental principles of supply and demand. Drug addiction cannot be treated through criminalization alone. As long as demand remains, attempts to reduce the supply only raise prices, increasing profits for drug traffickers. The parallels to Prohibition (1920-1933), when alcohol production and sale were illegal, highlight the same issue: prohibition without addressing demand only leads to an underground market and increased crime.

A New Approach: Smart Prohibition and Smart Legalization

Effective solutions to address the U.S. drug problem must focus on treatment rather than punishment. One proposed solution is "Smart Prohibition and Smart Legalization," which suggests regulating certain drugs, like marijuana, under government oversight while treating other drugs as public health concerns rather than criminal offenses. Such programs would offer rehabilitation instead of imprisonment for possession of hard drugs, while supporting public health measures like clean needle exchanges, access to Naloxone, and rehabilitation programs.

Successful Models: Drug Courts and Rehabilitation

Drug courts offer a promising model by focusing on rehabilitation rather than incarceration. In areas where drug courts are implemented, re-arrest rates drop by up to 28%, and cost savings of over $6,700 per participant have been documented. This model has gained support for its dual benefits of reducing criminal recidivism and offering drug users a chance at recovery.

Conclusion: Shifting Policy to Reduce Harm

The War on Drugs has resulted in tremendous loss of life, financial waste, and lasting harm to communities. Moving forward, it is essential to replace this failed approach with policies focused on public health, treatment, and harm reduction. The U.S. must adopt evidence-based solutions to address drug abuse and related violence, supporting those affected rather than criminalizing them. Ending the War on Drugs requires a decisive shift towards policies that prioritize human well-being, restore communities, and reduce unnecessary suffering.