By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 1117 |
Pages: 2|
6 min read
Published: May 19, 2020
Words: 1117|Pages: 2|6 min read
Published: May 19, 2020
Physical activity is particularly important among older adults, for they can benefit greatly from increasing activity levels. In adulthood, physical activity consistently shows a positive association with broader constructs, such as perceived quality of life and feelings of wellbeing (Bize, Johnson, & Plotnikoff, 2007). However, around 3. 2 million deaths per year are attributed to inactivity internationally (Taylor, 2014). According to the World Health Organization (2010), the five leading causes of death are high blood pressure, smoking, high blood glucose, physical activity, and obesity. Physical inactivity also can contribute to high blood pressure, high blood glucose, and obesity. Overall, higher levels of physical activity were also associated with a 7% lower risk of total cancer (Moore el al. , 2016).
Increased physical activity has even been suggested as the most crucial intervention to improve health across a population (Paterson et al. , 2007). Still, even with these startling statistics, less than 20% of North Americans are meeting suggested physical activity guidelines. Older adults on average are even less physically active, with them being the most physically inactive out of all age groups (Troiano et al. , 2008). Since older adults generally do not work, their neighborhood is where they spend most of their time. Existing research has shown that physical environmental factors from the built environment, such as neighborhood walkability, partially explain older adults’ physical activity (Carlson et al. , 2012). Older people may be specifically sensitive to influences from the built environment, for they often prefer shorter walking distances, desire safe pedestrian facilities, and have more free time to spend in infrastructures such as parks and community fitness centers. Sallis et al. (2006) created a framework that incorporates four active living domains (occupation, household, leisure, and transport) and states that relationships between socio-ecological correlates and PA are domain-specific.
For older adults, their main active living domains would be household and leisure, as well as a large reliance on transportation if they are unable to drive. Still, it seems as if changing the built environment can only benefit a community depending on the social cognition of the individuals within that community. Fleig et al. (2016) showed that, among a sample of older adults, the effects of walkability and physical activity were mediated completely through perceptions of behavioral control. A possible solution to this problem could be a relationship between physical activity, built environment, and social networks. Physical activity interventions in older adults often focus on changing psychosocial skills, barriers, self-efficacy and social support (Kahn et al. , 2002). Walkability of a community interacts with social support in explaining total Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) of older adults. There was also a relationship between walkability, social support, self-efficacy, and barriers in explaining walking for transportation (Carlson et al. , 2012). Therefore, since the relationship with the built environment, social cognition, and physical activity is so complex, it is difficult to really decide what the right solution is for a community of older adults that is inactive. With the population of older adults rising with baby boomers, it is crucial that this problem be addressed so chronic diseases and mortality can be prevented in the future.
Discussion Questions with Short Answers (no longer than 2 pages, double-spaced):
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled