The Manipulation of The General Public Through American Media During The 2016 Presidential Elections

About this sample

About this sample


Words: 617 |

Page: 1|

4 min read

Published: Oct 4, 2018

Words: 617|Page: 1|4 min read

Published: Oct 4, 2018

American media is probably one of the most influential means of determining public opinion. This can be said for a variety of different topics, from entertainment to politics. This last presidential election was no exception. The race to presidency between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton was one of the most passionate ones in our nation’s history, leaving voters of all demographics with a passionate opinion of some sort. Depending on the individual views regarding each candidate, people were left either ecstatic, enraged, afraid, or anything else in between. Thanks to the media bias of American journalism, the opinions of the general public were more easily manipulated. Two of the main media theories that were used in doing this were the agenda setting theory as well as media logic.

'Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned'?

It is no secret that the majority of mainstream American news sources demonstrate some form of political bias. For example, CNN clearly demonstrates a favoritism towards liberals whereas Fox News leans more towards conservative ideations. Because of the biased views that many mainstream news mediums possess, this makes politics much more entertaining for the American people than it should be. They clearly abide by their own political ideologies. This can be noticed by the way that anchors, interviewers, and other news reporting personnel articulate themselves while they are on the air. This is a clear example of the agenda setting theory.

When news sources report according to their own beliefs, they strive to influence other parties as well (Altheide). This is precisely what agenda setting theory is. While this is considered unethical in terms of journalism, it is, unfortunately, a practice which many journalists and news mediums are allowed to get away with. It is a matter of using the correct words as to make their bias more well-hidden in order to influence the third parties, which are also affected by the political figures and ideas that these news mediums support (or oppose). Such parties can include external organizations, individual citizens as a general population, and political figures themselves. One example that stands out the most has been a recurring one, especially in the early stages of the election. The example that I speak of is the constant mutually disdainful banter between President-elect Donald Trump and Fox News Reporter Megyn Kelly. Kelly clearly had distaste towards Trump, and never ceased to take an opportunity to bash him. In like fashion, Mr. Trump would typically respond with some sort of condescending and politically incorrect remark of his own.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.

After the first couple of instances, it was plain to see that Ms. Kelly was clearly trying to get a rise out of Mr. Trump. She seemed to know that he would lose his temper, and would respond in ways that would hurt his own image. As to why a reporter for a conservatively biased news source would do this to a candidate of their own political interest is anybody’s guess. What can be inferred, however, is that this was clearly the direction that Fox had intended to take. Media logic was also demonstrated in these instances. Americans digest their news more effectively if it is entertaining and in alignment with their own beliefs (Brown and Deegan). While argumentative rhetoric can hardly be considered professional, especially in terms of politics, it is what the American people crave. In the United States, biased media logic is what hooks many of the viewers, which in turn influences their own individual beliefs. The agenda setting and media logic theories are a couple of the most widely implemented concepts in American news and politics because of this. Since Americans love controversy and feeling superior, they are more inclined to follow news mediums that practice these.

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson
This essay was reviewed by
Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

The Manipulation of the General Public Through American Media During the 2016 Presidential Elections. (2018, October 02). GradesFixer. Retrieved June 20, 2024, from
“The Manipulation of the General Public Through American Media During the 2016 Presidential Elections.” GradesFixer, 02 Oct. 2018,
The Manipulation of the General Public Through American Media During the 2016 Presidential Elections. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 20 Jun. 2024].
The Manipulation of the General Public Through American Media During the 2016 Presidential Elections [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2018 Oct 02 [cited 2024 Jun 20]. Available from:
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled


Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.


    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts


    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!


    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now