Why Tattoos Should not Be Considered Unprofessional

In contemporary society, personal expression through tattoos and body piercings has become increasingly popular. These forms of body modification serve as a canvas for individuals to express their identity, beliefs, and creativity. However, a contentious issue persists: should tattoos still be considered unprofessional? This essay delves into the discrimination of tattoos and body piercing in the workplace, examining the historical context, evolving perceptions, and the need for inclusive employment practices.

The Historical Stigma of Tattoos and Piercings

To understand the modern debate surrounding tattoos and body piercings in the workplace, we must first explore their historical context. For centuries, various cultures have utilized tattoos and body piercings for ritualistic, cultural, or personal reasons. However, the Western world, particularly during the 20th century, developed a stigma against these forms of self-expression.

Historically, tattoos were often associated with counterculture movements, rebellion, or criminal affiliations, perpetuating negative stereotypes. Similarly, body piercings were met with skepticism and considered unconventional. These stigmas rooted in historical perceptions have carried over into contemporary society and influenced workplace policies and attitudes.

In the workplace, the historical stigma associated with tattoos and piercings has manifested in dress code policies that require employees to cover or remove visible body modifications. Such policies, born from outdated notions of professionalism, have perpetuated discrimination against individuals who choose to express themselves through these forms of personal adornment.

The Changing Landscape of Perception

In recent decades, societal perceptions of tattoos and body piercings have evolved significantly. As these forms of self-expression gained mainstream acceptance, their association with rebellion and non-conformity waned. Tattoos and piercings now symbolize diverse aspects of identity, such as cultural heritage, spirituality, and personal beliefs.

Moreover, many individuals in prominent positions, including professionals, artists, and even public figures, proudly display tattoos and piercings. This cultural shift has contributed to the normalization of body modification. Consequently, employers and society at large are increasingly recognizing that personal expression does not equate to unprofessionalism.

In today's world, tattoos and body piercings are integral parts of self-identity. They can signify a person's journey, beliefs, or cultural heritage. Recognizing this evolution in societal perception, workplaces should adapt their policies to accommodate these forms of expression, promoting inclusivity and diversity.

Challenging Discrimination in the Workplace

Despite changing perceptions, discrimination against tattoos and body piercing in the workplace persists. Many organizations still enforce dress codes that require employees to cover visible tattoos or remove certain piercings. Such policies disproportionately affect individuals who choose to express themselves through these forms of body modification.

It is essential to recognize that these policies perpetuate a form of appearance-based discrimination. Rather than evaluating an individual's qualifications, skills, and professionalism, employers may make judgments based on personal appearance. This can result in a loss of talented individuals and hinder diversity and inclusion efforts.

To address this issue, employers should reconsider their dress code policies. Instead of imposing blanket bans on tattoos and piercings, companies can adopt more inclusive guidelines. This might involve allowing visible tattoos and piercings while maintaining specific standards of cleanliness and professionalism. Such policies promote a diverse and inclusive workplace culture while respecting personal expression.

Practical Steps for Employers to Promote Inclusivity:

1. Review and Revise Dress Code Policies: Employers should revisit and revise their dress code policies to ensure they are inclusive and do not discriminate against individuals with tattoos or piercings.
2. Educate Employees: Conduct training sessions to educate employees and managers about diversity and inclusion, emphasizing that personal expression should not affect professional judgment.
3. Promote a Culture of Respect: Foster a workplace culture that values diversity, respect, and open-mindedness. Encourage employees to embrace differences and challenge stereotypes.
4. Seek Employee Input: Involve employees in the decision-making process regarding dress codes and other workplace policies to ensure inclusivity.
5. Create Clear Guidelines: If specific guidelines are necessary, provide clear and objective criteria for tattoos and piercings that do not disproportionately target certain groups.
6. Lead by Example: Leadership should set an example by embracing diversity and displaying acceptance of employees' personal expression choices.
7. Monitor and Address Discrimination: Implement procedures to address any reports of discrimination based on appearance or personal expression promptly.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the question of whether tattoos should still be considered unprofessional is a complex and evolving issue. The historical stigma associated with body modification has faded as contemporary society embraces diversity and personal expression. However, discrimination against tattoos and body piercing in the workplace persists, hindering diversity and inclusion efforts.

It is crucial for employers to reassess their dress code policies and recognize that professionalism transcends physical appearance. Embracing a more inclusive approach to tattoos and piercings in the workplace not only fosters a diverse and equitable environment but also reflects the evolving perceptions of personal expression in society. As we move forward, let us recognize that a person's worth and capabilities extend far beyond the surface of their skin. By promoting inclusivity, we can create workplaces that value individuality and foster innovation and creativity.

Works Cited

1. Fleischer, D. (2004). "The Workplace Dress Code: An Employer's Guide to Avoiding the Appearance of Discrimination." Labor Law Journal, 55(1), 1-10.
2. Gavai, A. (2010). "Workplace ethics and its impact on employee performance." Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 3(2), 35-45.
3. Martin, D., & Dula, C. (2010). "The institutionalization of tattoos and piercings as consumer culture." Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 223-238.
4. Martin, D., & Dula, C. (2017). "Stigma and stereotyping of tattoos: Perceptions of university students." Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 472-489.
5. Scovell, J. (2010). "Not just a pretty face: the underestimation of tattoos and piercings in the workplace." Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 15(3), 104-115.
6. Williams, K. D., Thomas, D. A., & Christensen, A. (2014). "Research on discrimination in organizations." Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 537-561.
7. Barnes, A., & Mager, B. (2016). Tattoos and employment: The new discrimination. Routledge.
8. Deitch, E. A., Barsky, A., Butz, R. M., Chan, S., Brief, A. P., & Bradley, J. C. (2003). "Subtle yet significant: The existence and impact of everyday racial discrimination in the workplace." Human Relations, 56(11), 1299-1324.
9. Finkelstein, L. M., & Burke, M. J. (1998). "Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: An integrative analysis." Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(11), 991-1013.
10. Kiley, J. W., & Swanson, J. W. (1998). "Critical factors in the assessment of applicant personality." Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(1), 61-72.