The Role of Leadership in The Workplace

Everyone in his or her life will have an employer of some kind that will either be a fantastic blessing or a horrible curse. Now the second one may sound unbearable, but it is still possible for one to endure such an authority figure and still be able to strive for greatness in the work place. It all depends on the outlook of the employee, not the employer. The mindset of what all bosses want from their workers is the key in finding the path to success. All bosses expect loyalty and handwork, as well as a drive from workers to improve themselves. Accepting these expectations with an open mind has led many towards their goals of greatness whether they have a good boss or a bad one. It is employees who are in charge of their destinies, not the employer.

It is a guarantee that every authority figure of some kind require some form of loyalty from their followers. This can be quite easy if somebody has a wonderful boss, but this is not always the case from a mean superior. There are still ways to show a sense of loyalty to either kind of person.

To give control over to a kind boss can become almost too easy. One might ask, “Hay, what’s wrong with giving complete control to a boss?”. There are several ways to look at this. One way is knowing that this good person is easy to like may help in motivating workers. The other mindset is a bit dangerous; the idea that this leader is your friend. It’s great to like an employer, but friendship is a bond between equals. A good boss may be easy to like, but they expect loyalty not friendship. There is room for this kindness, but it is not reserved for the work place. Good bosses are also loyal to their employees not just vice versa. They do this through kindness, rewards, and positive leadership in order to earn the respect of those below them. None of this is simple, but these executives are willing to go the extra mile in order to create an efficient work force.

The big issue that a lot of people have around the world is submitting loyalty to what they would consider a bad boss. Simply put, how can someone be loyal to a higher power when that higher power does not respect them back? This can be quiet challenging and has proven to be the down fall for many since lacking loyalty means a lack to of a drive to work for the one demanding this form of submission. A bad boss cannot do more harm than to use power to ask for something and not give anything in return. This atmosphere can turn the workplace into a battle ground where the leader punishes and the underlings find ways to revolt against the high command. Those who are found in this situation must look at doing good for their co-workers and for themselves. This mindset can look like loyalty to the boss and also allows workers to not fully summit themselves to this horrific executive. These problems seem may not seem as bad as good boss, but both parties have their issues. At the end of the day, the fate of employees is in their own hands.

Another key behavior a worker must deploy in tribute to his or her superior is admirable hard work. Doing the minimum is tempting for many and most pursue such easy tasks. However, putting extra time and energy is beneficial for both parties and looks great for both kind of boss; even if the bad one does not voice appreciation.

People tend to have different ideas for the perfect boss, but most of these fantasies revolve around the idea of being receiving small, simple tasks. This is a trap that a lot of people fall into that may lead to their termination from their current position. It does not matter how nice a boss may be, they still have the ability and willingness to fire those who don’t do their jobs. People are even denied bonuses, raises, or promotion for not putting in extra labor into their work. The right thing to do in these situations is to find weaknesses in that business and to spend time on fixing these flaws. A good boss will notice and reward this person. Even if there is no reward, this act of kindness will allow the sustainability of the business which keeps money flowing. Money flowing means jobs are kept from high ranking officials to those working up from the bottom.

Putting in extra work may seem to be a little challenging for a caring boss, but it is defiantly more difficult for those under an unappreciative leadership. Motivation is at a minimum when an official is not willing to use extra cash to reward those who increase in positive work ethic. This is a major challenge for those caught up in this situation who cannot even find a reason to do better. Just remember that keeping the business afloat keeps all workers afloat. These leaders may not give out positive motivation, so it is up to employees to motivate one another in the pursuit of sustainable funds to finance their lives.

One of the most important outlooks for a worker in any field is to strive towards improving. Now it’s crucial to have this mindset in order to move forward in working, but this ideology looks diverse when placed under these two different managements. It’s easy to believe in being better; it’s another level hardship in actually acting upon this belief.

There are some people who find it simple to improve themselves under a merciful employer while others find it quiet tasking. Those who look at this task with ease understand that their boss gives them plenty of opportunities to do extra work for the business and they know that they will be appreciated for it. The ones who have a harder time are those who do not think they have to do extra work. They don’t think they have to do more labor because their bosses are forgiving and they don’t think they have to do anything beyond expectations. Going the extra mile in an environment that is made to be positive by high ranking officials is still seen as an amazing act and is much appreciated. This does not only improve the reputation of the individual, but also reflects a professional look of the company and enhances the reputation of the boss for the better.

Going down the road of growing and improving can become much more tasking under an unappreciative boss with no remorse. This shrewd kind of leader will most likely already expect his or her underlings to already be the best. Those who are not the best are terminated at some point because they are found to not be unique with little to no reason for them to already be on the task force. Such a situation can be very challenging and can even cause mass anxiety throughout the team. This pressure should be used as a sign to show worth and to upgrade ones work ethic. One might as well quit if he or she looks inside under this boss and finds that their efforts are not used. The goal is to be a better worker and person even if the boss adds extra weight on someone’s plate.

Following a leadership is a common feature that can be found in all of mankind. Those who we call “boss” vary between good and bad. Both ask for loyalty, hard work, and a sense of improvement no matter which characteristic they fall under. It’s up to us how we follow these employers as employees. We end the day facing ourselves, not our bosses.

Works Cited

1. Gentry, W. A., Weber, T. J., & Sadri, G. (2020). Bosses' ethical leadership and followers' innovative work behaviors: Mediation of psychological safety climate and moderation of political skill. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 525-539.
2. Jaramillo, F., & Grisaffe, D. B. (2021). Effects of ethical leadership on followers' counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating role of supervisor-focused commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(1), 47-60.
3. Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341-367.
4. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160.
5. Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151-171.
6. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
7. Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122-141.
8. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
9. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230-240.
10. Van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1-60.