The law hasn’t always been this way. A generation ago, the traditional rule was that a seller of alcoholic beverages would enjoy legal immunity for harm caused by a drunken customer. The prevailing theory held that it was the customer’s voluntary consumption that directly caused...
One of the most well-known tenets of English law is that a person ‘should not be judged strenuously by reference to the awesome specter of his past life.’ This very well established tradition has led to the oft-cited rule of evidence law which prohibits reliance...
The United States Constitution’s Fifth Amendment requires that all people are given equal due process rights and a violation of those rights violate the constitution. The defendant, Johnson, argued that his convictions “should not be considered violent felonies and the Armed Career Criminal Act was...
The legal context surrounding the offer made by Johari to sell his yacht, Thunder, to Ben for RM2 million raises significant questions about contract formation and the implications of revocation. This essay will explore the elements necessary for a binding contract, the communication of offers...
Formalism is the outlook that law is an autonomous realm where key decisions concerning landmark or hard cases may be settled on or made exclusively through an application of legal concepts rather than looking at the law’s social consequences or depending on contentious moral or...
Evolution of legislation to promote youth justice in Canada can be traced from the mid-19th century when criminal laws specifically for young children were initiated. The first juvenile legislation act was the Juvenile Delinquents Act (JDA). Introduction of this was around 1908, and according to...
What is a lawful order? A lawful order is any order that is given by a superior non-commissioned officer or commissioned officer in line of a regulation, given to aid in the success of the mission, they should not be given based on personal beliefs...
Introduction There have been various effects in Canada’s Juvenile justice system from the time that the juvenile system it has existed, and most recently when YCJA Act, i.e., Youth Criminal Justice Act. There has a primary rationale that has been enacting the statute to reduce...
Judges has various roles and duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior...
Michael J. Sandel discusses how there are three different approaches to justice: welfare, virtue, and freedom. The theme of the book is on how and what is considered moral. He introduces several perspectives on morality and we as readers are given insight into what people...
Criminal Justice
Justice
Get a personalized essay in under 3 hours!
Expert-written essays crafted with your exact needs in mind
Dicey defined The Royal Prerogative as “the residue of the discretionary or arbitrary power legally left in the hands of the crown.” This means that powers which belong to the crown alone could only be considered prerogative powers. It is a set of powers that...
Roman law was very influential in the development of law throughout Western civilization and some parts of the East. These influences continue to be seen in present day legal systems. It has formed the basis for law codes in the majority of countries of continental...
The Government of Kenya has been implementing various Social Protection Programmes across the country to cushion Kenyan Citizens from extreme poverty. These schemes were given an impetus by the 2006 African Union meeting in Livingstone, Zambia, following which the Government of Kenya initiated a wide...
Introduction In Lee v. Weisman, the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional for a public school in Rhode Island to have a member of the clergy deliver a prayer at graduation ceremonies. In 1989, Robert E. Lee, principal of Nathan Bishop Middle School, invited...
Prompt Examples for “King Lear” Essay Themes of Power and Wealth: Explore the themes of power and wealth in Shakespeare’s “King Lear” and their impact on the characters and the overall plot. Character Analysis: Analyze the character of King Lear and his views on justice...
Prohibition in the Great Gatsby symbolizes the resistance of the American people. F. Scott Fitzgerald gives the readers an inside look to the 1920’s. The Great Gatsby is brimming with the resistance of the alcohol bans set in place by the U.S. government. Made-to-order essay...
India is a nation where the rule of law prevails, and the judiciary, as the third pillar of democracy, is often regarded as the most trusted institution. However, recent controversies surrounding the Chief Justice of India (CJI), particularly allegations of nepotism and abuse of power,...
A Certified Peer Recovery Advocate can impact public policy through advocacy from a unique perspective. Their experiences provide real-life examples demonstrating the needs of people with substance use disorders and the outcomes of public policy on substance use disorder recovery success. The CPRA should not...
In this case, R v Adomako (1995) reintroduced gross negligence homicide yet left helpful murder untouched. Past cases had preferred manslaughter in view of objective recklessness, for example, R v Lawrence[1] and Kong Cheuk Kwan v The Queen (1985)[2]. Gross negligence manslaughter relies upon the...