By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 519 |
Page: 1|
3 min read
Published: Jan 4, 2019
Words: 519|Page: 1|3 min read
Published: Jan 4, 2019
Soybeans are primarily processed for their oil, which leads to the generation of two primary by-products - soybean meal and soybean hulls. Soybean hulls are actually the skin of the soybean which comes off during processing. These soyhulls are quite small in size and are not very dense. Therefore, many soyhulls are pelleted to increase ease of handling and bulk density. With respect to nutritional value, the loose and pelleted hulls are equal. Most of the time soyhulls are priced competitively to corn. In order to determine which is a better buy we must first determine how they compare on a nutritional basis. The two nutrients that we are most interested in are energy and protein. Corn contains 90% TDN (total digestible nutrients, an index of energy content) and 8 to 10% protein.
Soyhulls are not as straightforward, in fact, three different publications give them three different energy values. The 1984 NRC publication for beef cattle lists them at 64% TDN, the 1996 NRC for beef cattle lists them at 80% TDN and the latest NRC for dairy cattle assigns them a value of 77% TDN. All agree that they contain approximately 12% crude protein. Why this discrepancy in TDN content? Primarily because of the way in which they are used. If we were to feed a group of cattle a diet that contained 90% corn and another group a diet that contained 90% soyhulls then the results would show that corn would provide 10 to 20% faster gains than the soyhulls. However, when we feed diets that contain only a small portion of the diet as corn or soyhulls then the soyhulls provide gains equal to those provided by the corn. For example, we have a group of cows that have just begun calving. They have been consuming about 25 pounds of hay per day, but now that they are calving we need to supplement the hay.
Let’s compare corn and soyhulls. We supplement with 5 pounds of corn per day and the end result is that the cows are now consuming the 5 pounds of corn but their hay consumption drops to about 18 or 19 pounds per day. Their total energy intake is still greater than it was when they were consuming 25 pounds of hay but the corn has a negative impact on total intake (now at about 23 or 24 pounds) and will also decrease the digestibility of the hay. The comparison is that we supplement with 5 pounds of soyhulls per day.
Now the final result will be that they will consume the 5 pounds of soyhulls and about 21 to 22 pounds of hay per day and the digestibility of the hay may be improved. Even though the soyhulls contain less TDN per pound than does corn, they are equal to the corn as a supplement for cattle consuming forages because of their positive impact on forage intake and digestibility. In addition to the positive effects with regard to the TDN fraction, they also contain more protein than the corn. These same effects can be observed when soyhulls replace corn in a broiler litter-based diet.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled