Womens Brains Stephen Glould Analysis

About this sample

About this sample


Words: 549 |

Page: 1|

3 min read

Published: Mar 20, 2024

Words: 549|Page: 1|3 min read

Published: Mar 20, 2024

Table of contents

  1. Gould's Critique of Phrenology
  2. Biases in Scientific Studies
  3. The Role of Social Constructs
  4. Conclusion

In essay "Women's Brains," Stephen Jay Gould challenges the long-held belief that women are intellectually inferior to men due to differences in brain size. Gould argues that this belief is based on flawed scientific studies and perpetuated by societal biases. In this essay, I will critically analyze Gould's argument, examining the evidence he presents and evaluating the strength of his reasoning.

'Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned'?

Gould's Critique of Phrenology

Gould begins his essay by critiquing the pseudoscience of phrenology, which claims that the size and shape of the skull can be used to determine an individual's intellectual and moral characteristics. He highlights the fallacy of using brain size as a measure of intelligence, citing the case of the renowned mathematician and physicist, Marie Curie, whose brain was found to be smaller than average.

Gould's critique of phrenology effectively undermines the argument that brain size is a reliable indicator of intelligence. However, he fails to address more recent studies that have found correlations between brain size and cognitive abilities. While the correlation may not be absolute, the evidence suggests that there is some relationship between brain size and intelligence.

Biases in Scientific Studies

Gould goes on to discuss the biases present in scientific studies that have purported to demonstrate sex-based differences in brain size and intellectual abilities. He points out that many of these studies were conducted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a time when gender biases were pervasive in academia and society at large.

Gould's critique of the biases in these studies is well-founded, and he effectively demonstrates how societal prejudices can influence scientific research. However, his argument would have been strengthened by addressing more recent studies that have attempted to account for these biases. While it is important to acknowledge the limitations of early research, it is also necessary to consider more current evidence that may contradict or support the initial findings.

The Role of Social Constructs

One of the central arguments in Gould's essay is that societal constructs have played a significant role in perpetuating the belief in women's intellectual inferiority. He points to the historical and cultural factors that have contributed to the marginalization of women in the fields of science and academia, leading to biased interpretations of scientific data.

Gould's analysis of the impact of social constructs on perceptions of women's intelligence is compelling, and he effectively highlights the need to critically examine the cultural and historical context in which scientific research is conducted. However, his argument would have been strengthened by providing more concrete examples of how these social constructs have influenced specific scientific studies and their interpretations.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.


In conclusion, Stephen Jay Gould's essay "Women's Brains" presents a thought-provoking critique of the belief in women's intellectual inferiority based on brain size. While his argument effectively challenges the pseudoscience of phrenology and the biases present in early scientific studies, it would have been strengthened by addressing more recent evidence that may support or contradict the initial findings. Additionally, his analysis of the impact of social constructs on perceptions of women's intelligence would have been more persuasive with specific examples of how these constructs have influenced scientific research. Overall, Gould's essay serves as a valuable contribution to the ongoing conversation about gender and intelligence, prompting readers to critically examine the evidence and assumptions underlying long-held beliefs.

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson
This essay was reviewed by
Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

Womens Brains Stephen Glould Analysis. (2024, March 20). GradesFixer. Retrieved June 21, 2024, from
“Womens Brains Stephen Glould Analysis.” GradesFixer, 20 Mar. 2024,
Womens Brains Stephen Glould Analysis. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 21 Jun. 2024].
Womens Brains Stephen Glould Analysis [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2024 Mar 20 [cited 2024 Jun 21]. Available from:
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled


Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.


    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts


    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!


    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now